*       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *
 * <p>The {@code Iterable} specification does not make it absolutely clear what should happen on a
 * second invocation, so implementors have made various choices, including:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>returning the same iterator again
 *   <li>throwing an exception of some kind
 *   <li>or the usual, <i>robust</i> behavior, which all known {@link Collection} implementations
 *       have, of returning a new, independent iterator
 * </ul>
 *

# For Python 3.13t, do not install twine as it does not have pre-built wheels
# for this Python version and building it from source fails. We only need twine
# to be present on the system Python which in this case is 3.12.
# Same reason for Python 3.14.
if [[ ${VERSION} == "python3.13-nogil" || ${VERSION} == "python3.14" || ${VERSION} == "python3.14-nogil" ]]; then
  grep -v "twine" $REQUIREMENTS > requirements_without_twine.txt

</p>

<h3 id="amd64">64-bit Intel 386 (a.k.a. amd64)</h3>

<p>
The two architectures behave largely the same at the assembler level.
Assembly code to access the <code>m</code> and <code>g</code>
pointers on the 64-bit version is the same as on the 32-bit 386,
except it uses <code>MOVQ</code> rather than <code>MOVL</code>:
</p>

<pre>
get_tls(CX)
MOVQ	g(CX), AX     // Move g into AX.

        assertEquals(8, result);
        assertNotNull(response.getResults());
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test multiple calls to getResults return same instance")
    void testMultipleGetResultsCalls() throws Exception {
        response = new Smb2QueryDirectoryResponse(mockConfig, (byte) 0x03);

        // Use reflection to set the results field

}

// BaseOptions represents common options for all Storage API calls
type BaseOptions struct{}

// RenameOptions represents rename API options, currently its same as BaseOptions
type RenameOptions struct {
	BaseOptions
}

// DiskInfoOptions options for requesting custom results.
type DiskInfoOptions struct {
	DiskID  string `msg:"id"`
	Metrics bool   `msg:"m"`

// scanning lines, a [SplitFunc] can return (0, nil, nil) to signal the
// [Scanner] to read more data into the slice and try again with a
// longer slice starting at the same point in the input.
//
// The function is never called with an empty data slice unless atEOF
// is true. If atEOF is true, however, data may be non-empty and,
// as always, holds unprocessed text.

            "contents were not equal and in the same order: "
                + "expected = "
                + expected
                + ", actual = "
                + actual);
      }
    }

    if (expectedIter.hasNext() || actualIter.hasNext()) {
      // actual either had too few or too many elements
      fail(
          "contents were not equal and in the same order: "
              + "expected = "