println(e)
      }
    }
  }

  fun recordedConnectionEventTypes(): List<String> = connectionListener.recordedEventTypes()

  companion object {
    /**
     * A network that resolves only one IP address per host. Use this when testing route selection
     * fallbacks to prevent the host machine's various IP addresses from interfering.
     */
    private val SINGLE_INET_ADDRESS_DNS =

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nonnull;
import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * The result of a dependency resolution request.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 * @see DependencyResolver#resolve(DependencyResolverRequest)
 */
@Experimental
public interface DependencyResolverResult extends Result<DependencyResolverRequest> {

    /**
     * Gets the exceptions that occurred while building the dependency graph.

  # Source the default ci values
  source ./ci/official/envs/ci_default

  # TODO(angerson) write this documentation
  # Sources every env, in order, from the comma-separated list "TFCI"
  # Assumes variables will resolve themselves correctly.
  set +u
  for env_file in ${TFCI//,/ }; do
    source "./ci/official/envs/$env_file"
  done
  set -u
  echo '==TFCI==: Evaluated the following TFCI variables from $TFCI:'
  export -p | grep TFCI

 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Immutable
public interface DependencyResolverRequest extends RepositoryAwareRequest {

    enum RequestType {
        COLLECT,
        FLATTEN,
        RESOLVE
    }

    @Nonnull
    RequestType getRequestType();

    @Nonnull
    Optional<Project> getProject();

    @Nonnull
    Optional<Artifact> getRootArtifact();

    @Nonnull

            config = configFile("checkstyle-groovy.xml")
            source(allGroovy)
            classpath = compileClasspath
            reports.xml.outputLocation = checkstyle.reportsDir.resolve("${******@****.***}-groovy.xml")
        }
    }
}

codenarc {
    config = configFile("codenarc.xml")
    reportFormat = "console"
}

tasks.withType<CodeNarc>().configureEach {

When you check the benchmarks, it is common to see several tools of different types compared as equivalent.

Specifically, to see Uvicorn, Starlette and FastAPI compared together (among many other tools).

The simpler the problem solved by the tool, the better performance it will get. And most of the benchmarks don't test the additional features provided by the tool.

The hierarchy is like:

* **Uvicorn**: an ASGI server

        public String getLocation() {
            return source.getLocation();
        }

        @Override
        public ModelSource2 getRelatedSource(String relPath) {
            Source rel = source.resolve(relPath);
            return rel != null ? new SourceWrapper(rel) : null;
        }

        @Override
        public URI getLocationURI() {
            Path path = source.getPath();

import org.codehaus.plexus.interpolation.RecursionInterceptor;
import org.codehaus.plexus.interpolation.ValueSource;

/**
 * Use a regular expression search to find and resolve expressions within the POM.
 *
 * @deprecated use {@code org.apache.maven.api.services.ModelBuilder} instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")

import org.apache.maven.execution.MavenExecutionRequest;
import org.apache.maven.execution.MavenSession;
import org.apache.maven.impl.InternalSession;
import org.apache.maven.impl.resolver.MavenSessionBuilderSupplier;
import org.apache.maven.internal.impl.DefaultLookup;
import org.apache.maven.internal.impl.DefaultSessionFactory;
import org.apache.maven.internal.impl.InternalMavenSession;

mientras te encargas tú mismo de los otros conceptos de despliegue.

Revisa el próximo capítulo para aprender sobre **FastAPI** con contenedores (por ejemplo, Docker y Kubernetes). Verás que esas herramientas tienen formas sencillas de resolver los otros **conceptos de despliegue** también. ✨...