}

    @Override
    public int hashCode() {
      return f.hashCode() ^ p.hashCode();
    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // TODO(cpovirk): maybe make this look like the method call does ("Predicates.compose(...)")
      return p + "(" + f + ")";
    }

    @GwtIncompatible @J2ktIncompatible private static final long serialVersionUID = 0;
  }

  /**

	format = &formatErasureV3{}
	if err = json.Unmarshal(data, format); err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

	if heal {
		info, err := disk.DiskInfo(context.Background(), DiskInfoOptions{NoOp: heal})
		if err != nil {
			return nil, err
		}
		format.Info = info
	}

	// Success.
	return format, nil
}

// Valid formatErasure basic versions.

</p>

<p>
The assembler program is a way to parse a description of that
semi-abstract instruction set and turn it into instructions to be
input to the linker.
If you want to see what the instructions look like in assembly for a given architecture, say amd64, there
are many examples in the sources of the standard library, in packages such as
<a href="/pkg/runtime/"><code>runtime</code></a> and

## `async` and `await` { #async-and-await }

Modern versions of Python have a very intuitive way to define asynchronous code. This makes it look just like normal "sequential" code and do the "awaiting" for you at the right moments.

When there is an operation that will require waiting before giving the results and has support for these new Python features, you can code it like:

	NGCW R13, R8                               // e8030d5a
	NGC R2, R7                                 // e70302da
	NGCSW R10, R5                              // e5030a7a
	NGCS R24, R16                              // f00318fa
	NOOP                                        // 1f2003d5
	ORNW R4@>11, R16, R3                       // 032ee42a
	ORN R22@>19, R3, R3                        // 634cf6aa
	ORRW $4294443071, R15, R24                 // f8490d32

      }
    };

    // Masks used to compute indices in the following table.

    static final int ACCESS_MASK = 1;
    static final int WRITE_MASK = 2;
    static final int WEAK_MASK = 4;

    /** Look-up table for factories. */
    static final EntryFactory[] factories = {
      STRONG,
      STRONG_ACCESS,
      STRONG_WRITE,
      STRONG_ACCESS_WRITE,
      WEAK,
      WEAK_ACCESS,
      WEAK_WRITE,

    This regression was introduced in OkHttp 4.3.0.
 *  Fix: Don't crash with an `IllegalArgumentException` when using custom trust managers on
    Android 10. Android uses reflection to look up a magic `checkServerTrusted()` method and we
    didn't have it.
 *  Fix: Explicitly specify the remote server name when making HTTPS connections on Android 5. In

     * the share and the ACL on the folder being shared.
     * Go to <i>Computer Management</i>
     * &gt; <i>System Tools</i> &gt; <i>Shared Folders</i> &gt; <i>Shares</i> and
     * look at the <i>Properties</i> for a share. You will see two tabs - one
     * for "Share Permissions" and another for "Security". These correspond to
     * the ACLs returned by <code>getShareSecurity</code> and <code>getSecurity</code>

## 0.47.1

* Fix model filtering in `response_model`, cloning sub-models. PR [#889](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/889).
* Fix FastAPI serialization of Pydantic models using ORM mode blocking the event loop. PR [#888](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/888).

## 0.47.0

        policy.handlePotentialDeadlock(exception);
        return;
      }
      // Otherwise, it's the first time seeing this lock relationship. Look for
      // a path from the acquiredLock to this.
      Set<LockGraphNode> seen = Sets.newIdentityHashSet();
      ExampleStackTrace path = acquiredLock.findPathTo(this, seen);

      if (path == null) {