var a, b, c, x, y, z int;
	f := func() int { b--; return -b };

	// this fails on 6g: apparently it rewrites
	// the list into
	//	z = f();
	//	y = f();
	//	x = f();
	// so that the values come out backward.
	x, y, z = f(), f(), f();
	if x != 1 || y != 2 || z != 3 {
		println("xyz: expected 1 2 3 got", x, y, z);
		ok = false;
	}

	// this fails on 6g too.  one of the function calls
	// happens after assigning to b.

    }

    def "background job failure at configuration time fails build"() {
        given:
        buildFile << """
            def executors = $executors
            executors.userJobExecutor.execute {
                 throw new RuntimeException("Background job failed!")
            }

            task check {}
        """

        when:
        fails("check")

        then:

)

func TestContextHashCollisions(t *testing.T) {
	if debug {
		t.Skip("hash collisions are expected, and would fail debug assertions")
	}
	// Unit test the de-duplication fall-back logic in Context.
	//
	// We can't test this via Instantiate because this is only a fall-back in
	// case our hash is imperfect.
	//
	// These lookups and updates use reasonable looking types in an attempt to

        and:
        succeeds 'copyFiles'

    }

    def "fails when a force overwrites a locked version"() {
        given:
        mavenRepo.module('org', 'test', '1.0').publish()
        mavenRepo.module('org', 'test', '1.1').publish()

        lockfileFixture.createLockfile('lockedConf', ['org:test:1.1'], false)

        buildFile << """
dependencyLocking {
    lockAllConfigurations()
}

    AtomicInteger existingCounter = Maps.safeGet(countMap, element);
    if (existingCounter == null) {
      return false;
    }
    while (true) {
      int oldValue = existingCounter.get();
      if (oldValue < occurrences) {
        return false;
      }
      int newValue = oldValue - occurrences;
      if (existingCounter.compareAndSet(oldValue, newValue)) {
        if (newValue == 0) {

        succeeds 'checkDeps'
    }

    def "fails gracefully for invalid notations"() {
        when:
        buildFile <<  """
configurations {
    conf
}

dependencies {
    conf 100
}

task checkDeps
"""
        then:
        fails 'checkDeps'

	got, f, err := tpath.GetPathContext(node, util.PathFromString(pv.path), false)
	if err != nil || !f {
		return false, err
	}
	if reflect.TypeOf(got.Node) != reflect.TypeOf(pv.value) {
		return false, fmt.Errorf("comparison types don't match: got %v(%T), want %v(%T)", got.Node, got.Node, pv.value, pv.value)
	}
	if !reflect.DeepEqual(got.Node, pv.value) {
		return false, fmt.Errorf("values don't match: got %v, want %v", got.Node, pv.value)
	}

)

func TestContextHashCollisions(t *testing.T) {
	if debug {
		t.Skip("hash collisions are expected, and would fail debug assertions")
	}
	// Unit test the de-duplication fall-back logic in Context.
	//
	// We can't test this via Instantiate because this is only a fall-back in
	// case our hash is imperfect.
	//
	// These lookups and updates use reasonable looking types in an attempt to

=== "Python 3.10 nicht annotiert"

    !!! tip "Tipp"
        Bevorzugen Sie die `Annotated`-Version, falls möglich.

    ```Python hl_lines="6-7"
    {!> ../../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial005_py310.py!}
    ```

=== "Python 3.8 nicht annotiert"

    !!! tip "Tipp"
        Bevorzugen Sie die `Annotated`-Version, falls möglich.

    ```Python hl_lines="8-9"
    {!> ../../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial005.py!}
    ```

    }

    void "core plugins cannot be used with apply false"() {
        given:
        buildScript """
            plugins {
                id "java" apply false
            }
        """

        when:
        fails "help"

        then:
        failure.assertHasDescription("Error resolving plugin [id: 'java', apply: false]")