to ensure that autoscaling can occur optimially in all clusters,
within a set of global constraints on the total number of replicas
permitted across all clusters.  If replicas are not
required in some clusters due to low system load or insufficient quota
or capacity in those clusters, additional replicas are made available
to the autoscalers in other clusters if required.

### Node Components

                    }
                }
            }

            for (final String s : fessConfig.getSearchlogRequestHeadersAsArray()) {
                final String key = s.replace('-', '_').toLowerCase(Locale.ENGLISH);
                Collections.list(req.getHeaders(s)).stream().forEach(v -> {
                    searchLog.addRequestHeaderValue(key, v);
                });
            }

			for _, vv := range vars {
				subdb.Statement.Vars = append(subdb.Statement.Vars, vv)
				bindvar := strings.Builder{}
				subdb.BindVarTo(&bindvar, subdb.Statement, vv)
				sql = strings.Replace(sql, bindvar.String(), "?", 1)
			}

			subdb.Statement.SQL.Reset()
			subdb.Statement.Vars = stmt.Vars
			if strings.Contains(sql, "@") {
				clause.NamedExpr{SQL: sql, Vars: vars}.Build(subdb.Statement)

* La encriptación de la conexión ocurre a nivel de **TCP**.
    * Esa es una capa **debajo de HTTP**.
    * Por lo tanto, el manejo de **certificados y encriptación** se realiza **antes de HTTP**.
* **TCP no sabe acerca de "dominios"**. Solo sobre direcciones IP.
    * La información sobre el **dominio específico** solicitado va en los **datos HTTP**.

    `requestBodyEnd()`, both on the same call. Such events may be triggered by different threads
    even for a single call.

    Interceptors that rewrite or replace the request body may now inadvertently interfere with
    duplex request bodies. Such interceptors should check `RequestBody.isDuplex()` and avoid
    accessing the request body when it is.

 * Finally, every possible combination of row and column keys is always considered to have a value
 * associated with it: It is not possible to "remove" a value, only to replace it with {@code null},
 * which will still appear when iterating over the table's contents in a foreach loop or a call to a
 * null-hostile method like {@link ImmutableTable#copyOf}. For alternatives, please see <a

    @Test
    void toString_withMSBrowseName_shouldReplaceSpecialCharacters() {
        Name name = new Name(mockConfig, "\u0001MSBROWSE      ", 0x01, null);
        String result = name.toString();

        // Should replace first char with '..' and char at position 14 with '.'
        assertTrue(result.contains(".."));
        assertFalse(result.contains("\u0001"));
    }

    @Test

                    break;
                }
                suffix.append("%20");
            }
            name = name.replaceAll(" +$", suffix.toString());
        }
        return "URL:" + name.replace("?", "%3f");
    }

    /**
     * @return
     */
    private static boolean isWorkgroup(final SmbResource r) {
        try {
            return r.getLocator().isWorkgroup();

            }
            // Remove leading slash if present
            if (path.startsWith("/")) {
                path = path.substring(1);
            }
            return new File(tempDir, path.replace("/", File.separator)).getAbsolutePath();
        }

        @Override
        public void service(jakarta.servlet.ServletRequest req, jakarta.servlet.ServletResponse res) {
            // Not used in tests
        }

        return parseItem(false, isDigit, buf);
    }

    private static Item parseItem(boolean isCombination, boolean isDigit, String buf) {
        if (isCombination) {
            return new CombinationItem(buf.replace("-", ""));
        } else if (isDigit) {
            buf = stripLeadingZeroes(buf);
            if (buf.length() <= MAX_INTITEM_LENGTH) {
                // lower than 2^31
                return new IntItem(buf);