## ASGI middleware'leri ekleme { #adding-asgi-middlewares }

**FastAPI**, Starlette üzerine kurulu olduğu ve <abbr title="Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface - Asenkron Sunucu Ağ Geçidi Arayüzü">ASGI</abbr> spesifikasyonunu uyguladığı için, herhangi bir ASGI middleware'ini kullanabilirsiniz.

 * be registered in {@code META-INF/services/org.apache.maven.api.model.ModelObjectProcessor}.</p>
 *
 * <p>The service is called during model building for all model objects, allowing
 * implementations to decide which objects to process and how to optimize them.</p>
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
public interface ModelObjectProcessor {

    /**
     * Process a model object, potentially returning a pooled or optimized version.

Todo de una manera que proporcionara la mejor experiencia de desarrollo para todos los desarrolladores.

## Requisitos { #requirements }

Después de probar varias alternativas, decidí que iba a usar [**Pydantic**](https://docs.pydantic.dev/) por sus ventajas.

Tudo de uma forma que oferecesse a melhor experiência de desenvolvimento para todos os desenvolvedores.

## Requisitos { #requirements }

Após testar várias alternativas, eu decidi que usaria o [**Pydantic**](https://docs.pydantic.dev/) por suas vantagens.

   |
   | * provides: A list of key/value-pairs.
   |   Based on the toolchain-configuration in the pom.xml Maven will search for
   |   matching <provides/> configuration. You can decide for yourself which key-value
   |   pairs to use. Often used keys are 'version', 'vendor' and 'arch'. By default
   |   the version has a special meaning. If you configured in the pom.xml '1.5'

```Python
from fastapi import FastAPI
from unicorn import UnicornMiddleware

app = FastAPI()

app.add_middleware(UnicornMiddleware, some_config="rainbow")
```

`app.add_middleware()` recibe una clase de middleware como primer argumento y cualquier argumento adicional que se le quiera pasar al middleware.

## Middlewares integrados { #integrated-middlewares }

## What contributors can expect from us

1. **Human review, human decisions.** A real human developer will review your PR, provide feedback, and decide whether to accept or reject it. We may use AI tools to help us understand your changes, but a human is always in charge.

Guava, the best approach is to create an [issue][] (or comment on an existing
issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If we decide to pursue a feature request, it will go through a thorough process
of API design and review. Any code should come after this.

[APIs]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/API
[issue]: https://github.com/google/guava/issues

     * @return array of supported algorithm constants
     */
    int[] getSupportedAlgorithms();

    /**
     * Estimates the compression ratio for the given data and algorithm.
     * This can be used to decide whether compression is worthwhile.
     *
     * @param data the data to analyze
     * @param algorithm the compression algorithm
     * @return estimated compression ratio (0.0 to 1.0, where 0.5 means 50% size reduction)

      - benchmark
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Dump GitHub context
        env:
          GITHUB_CONTEXT: ${{ toJson(github) }}
        run: echo "$GITHUB_CONTEXT"
      - name: Decide whether the needed jobs succeeded or failed
        uses: re-actors/alls-green@release/v1
        with:
          jobs: ${{ toJSON(needs) }}