# Extra Data Types

Up to now, you have been using common data types, like:

* `int`
* `float`
* `str`
* `bool`

But you can also use more complex data types.

And you will still have the same features as seen up to now:

* Great editor support.
* Data conversion from incoming requests.
* Data conversion for response data.
* Data validation.
* Automatic annotation and documentation.

## Other data types

Files in this repo's `api/next` directory must have corresponding files in
`doc/next/*stdlib/*minor`.
The files should be in the subdirectory for the package with the new
API, and should be named after the issue number of the API proposal.
For example, if the directory `6-stdlib/99-minor` is present,
then an `api/next` file with the line

    pkg net/http, function F #12345

* Maven test harness for plugin execution model
* Eclipse IDE tooling for plugin execution model and metadata model

- we also seem to have information like the plugin lifecycle model that's buried inside the maven execution model
- we also seem to have artifact information tangled inside the plugin model
- we have to deal with scripting implementations (groovy, beanshell, ruby)
- we need to deal with a shared context for plugins, like the guarded mojos

/// info

Unfortunately, I can't simply trust PRs that just have several approvals.

Several times it has happened that there are PRs with 3, 5 or more approvals, probably because the description is appealing, but when I check the PRs, they are actually broken, have a bug, or don't solve the problem they claim to solve. 😅

                available, instead of erroring out, the dependency result will be
                `None`.

                This is useful when you want to have optional authentication.

                It is also useful when you want to have authentication that can be
                provided in one of multiple optional ways (for example, in a query
                parameter or in an HTTP Bearer token).
                """

    std::unique_ptr<TF_Status, decltype(&TF_DeleteStatus)> await_status(
        TF_NewStatus(), TF_DeleteStatus);
    // Wait until all pending nodes have completed since they may have a
    // reference to default_cancellation_manager_. We ignore the status return
    // since we already have a bad status to propagate.
    TFE_ContextAsyncWait(context, await_status.get());
    // Reset the cancellation manager on a bad status. Otherwise we'll cancel

  // The number of nodes that should be running the
  // daemon pod and have one or more of the daemon pod running and
  // available (ready for at least spec.minReadySeconds)
  // +optional
  optional int32 numberAvailable = 7;

  // The number of nodes that should be running the
  // daemon pod and have none of the daemon pod running and available
  // (ready for at least spec.minReadySeconds)
  // +optional

                    "operationId": "read_items_items__get",
                    "parameters": [
                        {
                            "description": "Query string for the items to search in the database that have a good match",
                            "required": False,
                            "deprecated": True,
                            "schema": IsDict(
                                {

	bp.Put(make([]byte, width))           // wrong capacity is rejected (very less)
	if len(bp.c) > 0 {
		t.Fatal("bytepool should have rejected invalid packets")
	}

	// Try putting a short slice into pool
	bp.Put(make([]byte, bp.w, bp.wcap)[:2])
	if len(bp.c) != 1 {
		t.Fatal("bytepool should have accepted short slice with sufficient capacity")
	}

	b = bp.Get()
	if len(b) != width {

        git diff --diff-filter ACMRT --name-only origin/master > $BATS_FILE_TMPDIR/changed_files
    fi
}

# Note: this is excluded on the full code base, since any submitted code must
# have passed Google's internal style guidelines.
@test "Check buildifier formatting on BUILD files" {
    echo "buildifier formatting is recommended. Here are the suggested fixes:"
    echo "============================="