app.flags = flags

# These symbols appear because we import the python package which
# in turn imports from tensorflow.core and tensorflow.python. They
# must come from this module. So python adds these symbols for the
# resolution to succeed.
# pylint: disable=undefined-variable
del python
del core

        executor.shutdown();

        // Then - All operations should succeed
        assertTrue(exceptions.isEmpty(), "No exceptions should occur");
        assertEquals(threadCount * opsPerThread, successCount.get(), "All operations should succeed");
    }

    /**
     * Test that buffer cache handles allocation when cache is full.
     */
    @Test

		}
		_, err = LoadX509KeyPair(certificate, privateKey)
		if err != nil && !testCase.shouldFail {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: test should succeed but it failed: %v", i, err)
		}
		if err == nil && testCase.shouldFail {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: test should fail but it succeed", i)
		}
		os.Remove(privateKey)
		os.Remove(certificate)
	}
}

var loadX509KeyPairTests = []struct {
	password                string

        if (!exceptions.isEmpty()) {
            fail("Concurrent operations caused exceptions: " + exceptions.get(0));
        }

        assertEquals(threadCount * opsPerThread, successCount.get(), "All operations should succeed");
    }

    /**
     * Test that session release with double-check pattern prevents race conditions.
     */
    @Test
    public void testSessionReleaseDoubleCheckPattern() throws Exception {

		host, port, err := extractHostPort(testCase.addr)
		if testCase.expectedErr == nil && err != nil {
			t.Fatalf("Test %d: should succeed but failed with err: %v", i+1, err)
		}
		if testCase.expectedErr != nil && err == nil {
			t.Fatalf("Test %d:, should fail but succeeded.", i+1)
		}
		if err == nil {
			if host != testCase.host {
				t.Fatalf("Test %d: expected: %v, found: %v", i+1, testCase.host, host)
			}

        assertTrue(rateLimiter.checkAttempt("user1", "192.168.1.1"), "First attempt should be allowed");

        // Record success
        rateLimiter.recordSuccess("user1", "192.168.1.1");

        // Should still be allowed
        assertTrue(rateLimiter.checkAttempt("user1", "192.168.1.1"), "After success should be allowed");
    }

    @Test
    public void testAccountLockout() throws Exception {

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  private static boolean trySetName(String threadName, Thread currentThread) {
    /*
     * setName should usually succeed, but the security manager can prohibit it. Is there a way to
     * see if we have the modifyThread permission without catching an exception?
     */
    try {
      currentThread.setName(threadName);
      return true;

     * might be cancelled before we set the runner thread. That would make it impossible to
     * interrupt, yet it will still run, since interruptTask will leave the runner value null,
     * allowing the CAS below to succeed.
     */
    Thread currentThread = Thread.currentThread();
    if (!compareAndSet(null, currentThread)) {
      return; // someone else has run or is running.
    }

    boolean run = !isDone();

sleep 5

./mc admin policy info minio2 projecta >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to succeed, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi
./mc admin policy info minio3 projecta >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to succeed, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin policy remove minio3 projecta

sleep 10
./mc admin policy info minio1 projecta

                return DcerpcError.DCERPC_FAULT_OP_RNG_ERROR;
            }
        }).when(mockHandle).sendrecv(any(MsrpcSamrConnect4.class));
        // Subsequent call for MsrpcSamrConnect2 should succeed
        doNothing().when(mockHandle).sendrecv(any(MsrpcSamrConnect2.class));

        try (SamrPolicyHandle handle = new SamrPolicyHandle(mockHandle, server, access)) {
            assertNotNull(handle);