* To provide best practices and solutions we (as the *build tool* team) want to promote.
* To avoid asking the same thing multiple times during code review.
* To explain *rejected solutions*, for now, and future development, in case they are proposed again.

ADRs can be written by any team.
Like code, they should be reviewed by any other relevant teams.

 * connections should expect repetition of stream IDs.
 *
 * Return true to request cancellation of a pushed stream.  Note that this does not guarantee
 * future frames won't arrive on the stream ID.
 */
interface PushObserver {
  /**
   * Describes the request that the server intends to push a response for.
   *
   * @param streamId server-initiated stream ID: an even number.

 * Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>The {@link Predicates} class provides common predicates and related utilities.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a

org.apache.lucene.search.TimeLimitingCollector#getGlobalTimerThread()
org.apache.lucene.search.TimeLimitingCollector#getGlobalCounter()

@defaultMessage Don't interrupt threads use FutureUtils#cancel(Future<T>) instead
java.util.concurrent.Future#cancel(boolean)

@defaultMessage Don't try reading from paths that are not configured in Environment, resolve from Environment instead
org.elasticsearch.core.PathUtils#get(java.lang.String, java.lang.String[])

import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Test case for {@link EventBus}.
 *
 * @author Cliff Biffle
 */

import com.google.common.collect.Lists;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.CopyOnWriteArrayList;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Test case for {@link EventBus}.
 *
 * @author Cliff Biffle
 */

I'll tell you a bit more about these **concepts** here, and that would hopefully give you the **intuition** you would need to decide how to deploy your API in very different environments, possibly even in **future** ones that don't exist yet.

By considering these concepts, you will be able to **evaluate and design** the best way to deploy **your own APIs**.

But it's provided here to be compliant with the specifications.

Also, there might be tools that expect and use it (now or in the future) and that might be useful for you or your users, now or in the future.

That's the benefit of standards...

///

## See it in action { #see-it-in-action }

Open the interactive docs: [http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs](http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs).

Pero se proporciona aquí para cumplir con las especificaciones.

Además, podría haber herramientas que lo esperen y lo usen (ahora o en el futuro) y eso podría ser útil para ti o tus usuarios, ahora o en el futuro.

Ese es el beneficio de los estándares...

///

## Verlo en acción { #see-it-in-action }

Use the formal grammar (use `vous` instead of `tu`).

Additionally, in instructional sentences, prefer the present tense for obligations:

- Prefer `vous devez …` over `vous devrez …`, unless the English source explicitly refers to a future requirement.

- When translating “make sure (that) … is …”, prefer the indicative after `vous assurer que` (e.g. `Vous devez vous assurer qu'il est …`) instead of the subjunctive (e.g. `qu'il soit …`).

### Quotes