new AbstractFuture<Object>() {
          @Override
          public String pendingToString() {
            return "cause=[Because this test isn't done]";
          }
        };
    assertThat(testFuture.toString())
        .matches(
            "[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING, info=\\[cause=\\[Because this test isn't done\\]\\]\\]");
    TimeoutException e = assertThrows(TimeoutException.class, () -> testFuture.get(1, NANOSECONDS));

                assertNotNull(result);
            } catch (Exception e) {
                // Expected behavior when components are not fully initialized
                Throwable cause = e.getCause();
                assertNotNull(cause);
            }
        } catch (Exception e) {
            // Test setup exception is acceptable
            assertNotNull(e);
        }
    }

	// metacacheSharePrefix controls whether prefixes on dirty paths are always shared.
	// This will make `test/a` and `test/b` share listings if they are concurrent.
	// Enabling this will make cache sharing more likely and cause less IO,
	// but may cause additional latency to some calls.
	metacacheSharePrefix = false
)

//go:generate msgp -file $GOFILE -unexported

// metacache contains a tracked cache entry.
type metacache struct {

    private final String originalMessage;
    private final String repositoryId;

    public WagonConfigurationException(String repositoryId, String message, Throwable cause) {
        super("While configuring wagon for '" + repositoryId + "': " + message, cause);

        this.repositoryId = repositoryId;
        this.originalMessage = message;
    }

    public WagonConfigurationException(String repositoryId, String message) {

the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

No, an upgrade should not cause any downtime. However, on the first startup -
since MinIO will attempt to migrate any existing IAM data - the boot process may
take slightly longer, but may not be visibly noticeable. Once the migration has

    )

    // This should fail the Call, but not cause an unhandled Exception bubbling up
    client.dispatcher.executorService.shutdownNow()

    val exception = callFailure.get(5, TimeUnit.SECONDS)
    assertThat(exception.message).isEqualTo("canceled due to java.lang.InterruptedException")
    assertThat(exception).isInstanceOf<IOException>()
    assertThat(exception.cause)
      .isNotNull()

        verify(treeHandle, never()).acquire();
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Constructor should handle null parent")
    void testConstructor_NullParent_ThrowsNPE() {
        // When & Then: Null parent should cause NullPointerException
        assertThrows(NullPointerException.class, () -> new NetServerEnumIterator(null, treeHandle, "*", 0, null));
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Constructor should handle null tree handle")

      switch (state.get()) {
        case SUBSUMED:
          throw new IllegalStateException(
              "Cannot call finishToFuture() after deriving another step");

        case WILL_CREATE_VALUE_AND_CLOSER:
          throw new IllegalStateException(
              "Cannot call finishToFuture() after calling finishToValueAndCloser()");

        case WILL_CLOSE:
        case CLOSING:
        case CLOSED:

 *   <li>enqueuing weak references to unreachable referents in their reference queue
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>This class uses (possibly repeated) invocations of {@link java.lang.System#gc()} to cause
 * finalization to happen. However, a call to {@code System.gc()} is specified to be no more than a
 * hint, so this technique may fail at the whim of the JDK implementation, for example if a user

     */
    if (isFinite(previousMean)) {
      // This is case 1.
      return value;
    } else if (isFinite(value) || previousMean == value) {
      // This is case 2. or 3b.
      return previousMean;
    } else {
      // This is case 3a. or 3c.
      return NaN;
    }
  }