if (submittingTaskQueue.thread == submitting) {
          sequencer = null;
          // Submit from inside a reentrant submit. We don't know if this one will be reentrant (and
          // can't know without submitting something to the executor) so queue to run iteratively.
          // Task must be null, since each execution on this executor can only produce one more
          // execution.
          checkState(submittingTaskQueue.nextTask == null);

   */
  protected final class MultiExceptionListIterator implements ListIterator<E> {
    // TODO: track seen elements when order isn't guaranteed
    // TODO: verify contents afterward
    // TODO: something shiny and new instead of Stack
    // TODO: test whether null is supported (create a Feature)
    /**
     * The elements to be returned by future calls to {@code next()}, with the first at the top of
     * the stack.

`@app.get("/")`は直下の関数が下記のリクエストの処理を担当することを**FastAPI**に伝えます:

* パス `/`
* <abbr title="an HTTP GET method"><code>get</code> オペレーション</abbr>

/// info | `@decorator` について

Pythonにおける`@something`シンタックスはデコレータと呼ばれます。

「デコレータ」は関数の上に置きます。かわいらしい装飾的な帽子のようです（この用語の由来はそこにあると思います）。

「デコレータ」は直下の関数を受け取り、それを使って何かを行います。

私たちの場合、このデコレーターは直下の関数が**オペレーション** `get`を使用した**パス**` / `に対応することを**FastAPI** に通知します。

 * }
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems
 * reasonable and it will be fine.
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>If checking whether the <i>caller</i> has violated your method or constructor's contract

You saw that you can use dependencies with `yield` and have `try` blocks that try to execute some code and then run some exit code after `finally`.

You can also use `except` to catch the exception that was raised and do something with it.

For example, you can raise a different exception, like `HTTPException`.

/// tip

   */
  protected final class MultiExceptionListIterator implements ListIterator<E> {
    // TODO: track seen elements when order isn't guaranteed
    // TODO: verify contents afterward
    // TODO: something shiny and new instead of Stack
    // TODO: test whether null is supported (create a Feature)
    /**
     * The elements to be returned by future calls to {@code next()}, with the first at the top of
     * the stack.

						continue
					}
				} else {
					entries = append(entries, entry)
				}
				count++
			}

			if len(h.logCh) > 0 || len(globalBuffer) > 0 || count == 0 {
				// there is something in the log queue
				// process it first, even if we tickered
				// first, or we have not received any events
				// yet, still wait on it.
				continue
			}

			// If we are doing batching, we should wait

@DoNotMock("Use ImmutableList.of or another implementation")
@GwtCompatible
@SuppressWarnings("serial") // we're overriding default serialization
// TODO(kevinb): I think we should push everything down to "BaseImmutableCollection" or something,
// just to do everything we can to emphasize the "practically an interface" nature of this class.
public abstract class ImmutableCollection<E> extends AbstractCollection<E> implements Serializable {
  /*

 *   <li><b>Convenience methods:</b> These are implementations of common operations that are
 *       typically implemented by opening a reader using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the reader that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Several methods in this class, such as {@link #readLines()}, break the contents of the source

 *   <li><b>Convenience methods:</b> These are implementations of common operations that are
 *       typically implemented by opening a reader using one of the methods in the first category,
 *       doing something and finally closing the reader that was opened.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Several methods in this class, such as {@link #readLines()}, break the contents of the source