if (submittingTaskQueue.thread == submitting) {
          sequencer = null;
          // Submit from inside a reentrant submit. We don't know if this one will be reentrant (and
          // can't know without submitting something to the executor) so queue to run iteratively.
          // Task must be null, since each execution on this executor can only produce one more

 *
 * All event methods must execute fast, without external locking, cannot throw exceptions,
 * attempt to mutate the event parameters, or be reentrant back into the client.
 * Any IO - writing to files or network should be done asynchronously.
 */
@ExperimentalOkHttpApi
abstract class ConnectionListener {
  /**

    return new CompactStriped<>(stripes, supplier);
  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@code Striped<Lock>} with eagerly initialized, strongly referenced locks. Every lock
   * is reentrant.
   *
   * @param stripes the minimum number of stripes (locks) required
   * @return a new {@code Striped<Lock>}
   */
  public static Striped<Lock> lock(int stripes) {
    return custom(stripes, PaddedLock::new);

          @Override
          protected Queue<Event> initialValue() {
            return Queues.newArrayDeque();
          }
        };

    /** Per-thread dispatch state, used to avoid reentrant event dispatching. */
    private final ThreadLocal<Boolean> dispatching =
        new ThreadLocal<Boolean>() {
          @Override
          protected Boolean initialValue() {
            return false;
          }

                  (startTime == 0L) ? timeoutNanos : remainingNanos(startTime, timeoutNanos),
                  reentrant);
      threw = false;
      return satisfied;
    } finally {
      if (!satisfied) {
        try {
          // Don't need to signal if timed out, but do if interrupted
          if (threw && !reentrant) {
            signalNextWaiter();
          }
        } finally {
          lock.unlock();

 *
 * <p>Disadvantages of EventBus include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>It makes the cross-references between producer and subscriber harder to find. This can
 *       complicate debugging, lead to unintentional reentrant calls, and force apps to eagerly
 *       initialize all possible subscribers at startup time.
 *   <li>It uses reflection in ways that break when code is processed by optimizers/minimizers like

          }
        };
    try {
      iter.hasNext();
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalStateException expected) {
    }
  }

  // Technically we should test other reentrant scenarios (4 combinations of
  // hasNext/next), but we'll cop out for now, knowing that
  // next() both start by invoking hasNext() anyway.

  /** Throws an undeclared checked exception. */

          }
        };
    try {
      iter.hasNext();
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalStateException expected) {
    }
  }

  // Technically we should test other reentrant scenarios (4 combinations of
  // hasNext/next), but we'll cop out for now, knowing that
  // next() both start by invoking hasNext() anyway.

  /** Throws an undeclared checked exception. */

  // TODO: Test waitFor(Guard, long, TimeUnit).
  // TODO: Test getQueueLength().
  // TODO: Test hasQueuedThreads().
  // TODO: Test getWaitQueueLength(Guard).
  // TODO: Test automatic signaling before leave, waitFor, and reentrant enterWhen.
  // TODO: Test blocking to re-enter monitor after being signaled.
  // TODO: Test interrupts with both interruptible and uninterruptible monitor.

  // TODO: Test waitFor(Guard, long, TimeUnit).
  // TODO: Test getQueueLength().
  // TODO: Test hasQueuedThreads().
  // TODO: Test getWaitQueueLength(Guard).
  // TODO: Test automatic signaling before leave, waitFor, and reentrant enterWhen.
  // TODO: Test blocking to re-enter monitor after being signaled.
  // TODO: Test interrupts with both interruptible and uninterruptible monitor.