int totalDataCount;
    int maxParameterCount;
    int maxDataCount = DEFAULT_MAX_DATA_COUNT;
    byte maxSetupCount;
    int timeout = 0;
    int setupCount = 1;
    byte subCommand;
    String name = "";
    int maxBufferSize; // set in SmbTransport.sendTransaction() before nextElement called

    byte[] txn_buf;

    SmbComTransaction() {
        maxParameterCount = 1024;

<div class="wrapper">
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/header.jsp"></jsp:include>
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/sidebar.jsp">
        <jsp:param name="menuCategoryType" value="suggest"/>
        <jsp:param name="menuType" value="elevateWord"/>
    </jsp:include>
    <main class="content-wrapper">
        <div class="content-header">
            <div class="container-fluid">

<div class="wrapper">
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/header.jsp"></jsp:include>
    <jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/sidebar.jsp">
        <jsp:param name="menuCategoryType" value="system"/>
        <jsp:param name="menuType" value="scheduler"/>
    </jsp:include>
    <main class="content-wrapper">
        <div class="content-header">
            <div class="container-fluid">

    assertThat(client.connectionPool.connectionCount()).isEqualTo(1)
  }

  /**
   * Test connecting to an alternative host then common name, although only subject alternative
   * names are used if present no special consideration of common name.
   */
  @Test
  fun alternativeThenCommon() {
    server.enqueue(MockResponse())
    server.enqueue(MockResponse())

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should work with null server name")
    void shouldHandleNullServerName() {
        // When
        MsrpcSamrConnect2 msrpcSamrConnect2 = new MsrpcSamrConnect2(null, testAccess, mockPolicyHandle);

        // Then
        assertNotNull(msrpcSamrConnect2, "Should handle null server name");
    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Should work with different access masks")

succeeded except for the part where the new replication controller is renamed back to the old name. You can just do another rolling update using kubectl 1.4 or higher to change the name back: look for a replication controller that has the original name plus a random suffix.

Unfortunately, there is a much rarer second possible failure mode: the replication controller gets renamed to the old name, but there is a duplicated set of pods in the cluster. kubectl will not report an error since...

            assertEquals(type, StorageType.valueOf(type.name()));
        }
    }

    public void test_ordinal() {
        assertEquals(0, StorageType.S3.ordinal());
        assertEquals(1, StorageType.GCS.ordinal());
        assertEquals(2, StorageType.S3_COMPAT.ordinal());
    }

    public void test_name() {
        assertEquals("S3", StorageType.S3.name());
        assertEquals("GCS", StorageType.GCS.name());

    private final byte[] pipeData;
    private final int pipeDataOff, pipeDataLen;

    TransCallNamedPipe(final String pipeName, final byte[] data, final int off, final int len) {
        name = pipeName;
        pipeData = data;
        pipeDataOff = off;
        pipeDataLen = len;
        command = SMB_COM_TRANSACTION;
        subCommand = TRANS_CALL_NAMED_PIPE;
        timeout = 0xFFFFFFFF;

    }

    @Override
    public String toString() {
        return "CrawlingInfo [crawlingInfoParamList=" + crawlingInfoParamList + ", createdTime=" + createdTime + ", expiredTime="
                + expiredTime + ", name=" + name + ", sessionId=" + sessionId + ", docMeta=" + docMeta + "]";
    }

    private static String toPlatformSpecific(String expected) {
        return expected.replace("/", File.separator).replace(":", File.pathSeparator);
    }

    /**
     * Tests the formatting of an option without module name.
     */
    @Test
    public void testOption() {
        String[] formatted = JavaPathType.MODULES.option(paths());
        assertEquals(2, formatted.length);
        assertEquals("--module-path", formatted[0]);