"net/http/httptest"
	"net/url"
	"strconv"
	"testing"

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/crypto"
	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/grid"
	xhttp "github.com/minio/minio/internal/http"
)

// Tests request guess function for net/rpc requests.
func TestGuessIsRPC(t *testing.T) {
	if guessIsRPCReq(nil) {
		t.Fatal("Unexpected return for nil request")
	}

	u, err := url.Parse("http://localhost:9000/minio/lock")
	if err != nil {

            } else {
    
                /* On NT without Unicode the fileNameLength
                 * includes the '\0' whereas on win98 it doesn't. I
                 * guess most clients only support non-unicode so
                 * they don't run into this.
                 */
    
    /* UPDATE: Maybe not! Could this be a Unicode alignment issue. I hope

            // TODO: SMB2 - do we need to check the MIDs?
            // We only read what we were waiting for, so first guess would be no.
            boolean verify = dgst.verify(buffer, i, size, 0, this);
            this.verifyFailed = verify;
            return !verify;
        }
        return true;
    }

```

But by using the `secrets.compare_digest()` it will be secure against a type of attacks called "timing attacks".

### Timing Attacks

But what's a "timing attack"?

Let's imagine some attackers are trying to guess the username and password.

And they send a request with a username `johndoe` and a password `love123`.

Then the Python code in your application would be equivalent to something like:

```Python

    public <T extends Address> T unwrap ( Class<T> type ) {
        if ( type.isAssignableFrom(this.getClass()) ) {
            return (T) this;
        }
        return null;
    }


    /**
     * Guess next called name to try for session establishment. These
     * methods are used by the smb package.
     * 
     * @return guessed name
     */
    @Override
    public String firstCalledName () {

### 2. Configure WSO2

Once WSO2 is up and running, configure WSO2 to generate Self contained id_tokens. In OAuth 2.0 specification there are primarily two ways to provide id_tokens

1. The id_token is an identifier that is hard to guess. For example, a randomly generated string of sufficient length, that the server handling the protected resource can use to lookup the associated authorization information.

			return "", "", err
		}

		host = addr

		switch scheme {
		case "https":
			port = "443"
		case "http":
			port = "80"
		default:
			return "", "", errors.New("unable to guess port from scheme")
		}
	}

	return host, port, nil
}

// isLocalHost - checks if the given parameter
// correspond to one of the local IP of the
// current machine

         * layer of fallback before consulting the system property, we could try
         * com.sun.security.auth.module.NTSystem.
         *
         * But for now, we use the value from the system property as our best guess.
         */
        return fromSystemProperty;
      } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
        throwIfUnchecked(e.getCause()); // in case it's an Error or something

}

// DropView drop view
func (m Migrator) DropView(name string) error {
	return m.DB.Exec("DROP VIEW IF EXISTS ?", clause.Table{Name: name}).Error
}

// GuessConstraintAndTable guess statement's constraint and it's table based on name
//
// Deprecated: use GuessConstraintInterfaceAndTable instead.

   *
   * <p><b>Performance note:</b> When feasible, {@code initialCapacity} should be the exact number
   * of values that will be added, if that knowledge is readily available. It is better to guess a
   * value slightly too high than slightly too low. If the value is not exact, the {@link
   * ImmutableLongArray} that is built will very likely occupy more memory than strictly necessary;