// 	}
	// }

	check := func(exp, got madmin.LockEntries) (int, bool) {
		if len(exp) != len(got) {
			return 0, false
		}
		sort.Slice(exp, byResourceUID{exp}.Less)
		sort.Slice(got, byResourceUID{got}.Less)
		// printEntries(exp)
		// printEntries(got)
		for i, e := range exp {
			if !e.Timestamp.Equal(got[i].Timestamp) {
				return i, false
			}

     * In that explanation's notation, our `overlap` check would be `x1 < y2 && y1 < x2`. We've
     * flipped one part of the check so that we're using "less than" in both cases (rather than a
     * mix of "less than" and "greater than"). We've also switched to "strictly less than" rather
     * than "less than or equal to" because of *handwave* the difference between "endpoints of
     * inclusive ranges" and "Cuts."
     */

            try ( SmbTreeHandleInternal th = (SmbTreeHandleInternal) f.getTreeHandle();
                  SmbSessionInternal sess = th.getSession().unwrap(SmbSessionInternal.class);
                  SmbTransportInternal t = (SmbTransportInternal) sess.getTransport() ) {

                int before = t.getInflightRequests();
                if ( before > 0 ) {

	Lt(gte).Build(builder)
}

// Lt less than for where
type Lt Eq

func (lt Lt) Build(builder Builder) {
	builder.WriteQuoted(lt.Column)
	builder.WriteString(" < ")
	builder.AddVar(builder, lt.Value)
}

func (lt Lt) NegationBuild(builder Builder) {
	Gte(lt).Build(builder)
}

// Lte less than or equal to for where
type Lte Eq

   * @param value any value in the range of the {@code int} type
   * @return the {@code int} value that equals {@code value}
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code value} is greater than {@link Integer#MAX_VALUE} or
   *     less than {@link Integer#MIN_VALUE}
   */
  public static int checkedCast(long value) {
    int result = (int) value;
    checkArgument(result == value, "Out of range: %s", value);
    return result;
  }

  /**

   * part of the smeared hash of the element not covered by the hashtable mask, whereas the low bits
   * are the "next" pointer (pointing to the next entry in the bucket chain), which will always be
   * less than or equal to the hashtable mask.
   *
   * <pre>
   * hash  = aaaaaaaa
   * mask  = 00000fff
   * next  = 00000bbb
   * entry = aaaaabbb
   * </pre>
   *

sedan
ju
denna
själv
detta
åt
utan
varit
hur
ingen
mitt
ni
bli
blev
oss
din
dessa
några
deras
blir
mina
samma
vilken
er
sådan
vår
blivit
dess
inom
mellan
sådant
varför
varje
vilka
ditt
vem
vilket
sitta
sådana
vart
dina
vars
vårt
våra
ert
era

		bp.Get() // discard
	}

	// Try putting some invalid buffers into pool
	bp.Put(make([]byte, bp.w, bp.wcap-1)) // wrong capacity is rejected (less)
	bp.Put(make([]byte, bp.w, bp.wcap+1)) // wrong capacity is rejected (more)
	bp.Put(make([]byte, width))           // wrong capacity is rejected (very less)
	if len(bp.c) > 0 {
		t.Fatal("bytepool should have rejected invalid packets")
	}

	// Try putting a short slice into pool

      assertThat(expected.message).isEqualTo(
        "Payload size must be less than or equal to 125",
      )
    }
  }

  @Test fun pongTooLongThrows() {
    assertFailsWith<IllegalArgumentException> {
      serverWriter.writePong((binaryData(1000)))
    }.also { expected ->
      assertThat(expected.message).isEqualTo(
        "Payload size must be less than or equal to 125",
      )
    }
  }

   * The new array contains nulls, even if the old array did not. If we wanted to be accurate, we
   * would declare a return type of `@Nullable T[]`. However, we've decided not to think too hard
   * about arrays for now, as they're a mess. (We previously discussed this in the review of
   * ObjectArrays, which is the main caller of this method.)
   */
  static <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] newArray(T[] reference, int length) {