【PS Vitaから】
“PlayStation Network”にサインインし、[設定]->[PlayStation Network]->[アカウント情報]より、
配信メール設定用のチェックボックス内のチェックを外してください。

【PCから】
下記URLからサインインし、［アカウント］->[配信メールの設定]より、
チェックボックス内のチェックを外してください。
https://account.sonyentertainmentnetwork.com/

※メールの配信停止処理をおこなうと、配信メールの種類の設定に関わらず
メールは配信されません。

◆配信されるメールの種類の変更について◆===============================
配信メールの種類の変更を希望される方は、下記のURLにある
「配信メールの設定」からサインインし、ご希望のメールを選択してください。

	_, err = deleteUserRPC.Call(ctx, client.gridConn(), grid.NewMSSWith(map[string]string{
		peerRESTUser: accessKey,
	}))
	return err
}

// DeleteServiceAccount - delete a specific service account.
func (client *peerRESTClient) DeleteServiceAccount(ctx context.Context, accessKey string) (err error) {
	_, err = deleteSvcActRPC.Call(ctx, client.gridConn(), grid.NewMSSWith(map[string]string{
		peerRESTUser: accessKey,

And then, you could give that JWT token to a user (or bot), and they could use it to perform those actions (drive the car, or edit the blog post) without even needing to have an account, just with the JWT token your API generated for that.

Using these ideas, JWT can be used for way more sophisticated scenarios.

labels.ldap_admin_security_principal=DN bind
labels.ldap_admin_security_credentials=Password
labels.ldap_base_dn=DN base
labels.ldapAccountFilter=Filtro account
labels.ldapGroupFilter=Filtro gruppo
labels.ldapMemberofAttribute=Attributo memberOf
labels.ldap_account_filter=Filtro account
labels.ldap_group_filter=Filtro gruppo
labels.ldap_memberof_attribute=Attributo memberOf
labels.notification_login=Pagina di login

   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> This method simply returns everything after the last '{@code .}' in the file's
   * name as determined by {@link File#getName}. It does not account for any filesystem-specific
   * behavior that the {@link File} API does not already account for. For example, on NTFS it will
   * report {@code "txt"} as the extension for the filename {@code "foo.exe:.txt"} even though NTFS

   *   <li>it may split characters and combining characters
   *   <li>it does not consider word boundaries
   *   <li>if truncating for display to users, there are other considerations that must be taken
   *       into account
   *   <li>the appropriate truncation indicator may be locale-dependent
   *   <li>it is safe to use non-ASCII characters in the truncation indicator
   * </ul>
   *

        unescapedChunkStart = nextIndex;
      }
      index = nextEscapeIndex(s, nextIndex, end);
    }

    // Process trailing unescaped characters - no need to account for escaped
    // length or padding the allocation.
    int charsSkipped = end - unescapedChunkStart;
    if (charsSkipped > 0) {
      int endIndex = destIndex + charsSkipped;
      if (dest.length < endIndex) {

        unescapedChunkStart = nextIndex;
      }
      index = nextEscapeIndex(s, nextIndex, end);
    }

    // Process trailing unescaped characters - no need to account for escaped
    // length or padding the allocation.
    int charsSkipped = end - unescapedChunkStart;
    if (charsSkipped > 0) {
      int endIndex = destIndex + charsSkipped;
      if (dest.length < endIndex) {

labels.searchlog_log_type_search_keyword=Keyword Count
labels.searchlog_log_type_search_zerohit=Zero Hit Count
labels.searchlog_log_type_search_zeroclick=Zero Click Count
labels.searchlog_log_type_search_count_hour=Search Count/Hour
labels.searchlog_log_type_search_count_day=Search Count/Day
labels.searchlog_log_type_search_user_hour=User Count/Hour
labels.searchlog_log_type_search_user_day=User Count/Day

add` does not apply to `DELETE` operations. The version being deleted on the source cluster needs to maintain state and ensure that the operation is mirrored to the target cluster prior to completing on the source object version. Since this needs to account for the target cluster availability and the need to serialize concurrent DELETE operations on different versions of the same object during multi DELETE operations, the current implementation queues the `DELETE` operations in both sync and async modes....