@Override
  protected void setUp() throws Exception {
    map = MutableClassToInstanceMap.create();
  }

  public void testConstraint() {
    /*
     * We'll give ourselves a pass on testing all the possible ways of breaking the constraint,
     * because we know that newClassMap() is implemented using ConstrainedMap which is itself
     * well-tested. A purist would object to this, but what can I say, we're dirty cheaters.
     */

          }
        BROWSER_COMPATIBLE_DATE_FORMATS[i] = format
      }
      position.index = 0
      result = format.parse(this, position)
      if (position.index != 0) {
        // Something was parsed. It's possible the entire string was not consumed but we ignore
        // that. If any of the BROWSER_COMPATIBLE_DATE_FORMAT_STRINGS ended in "'GMT'" we'd have

    volatile @Nullable Waiter next;

    /**
     * Constructor for the TOMBSTONE, avoids use of ATOMIC_HELPER in case this class is loaded
     * before the ATOMIC_HELPER. Apparently this is possible on some android platforms.
     */
    Waiter(boolean unused) {}

    Waiter() {
      // avoid volatile write, write is made visible by subsequent CAS on waitersField field

 * Second, it is always backed by an array large enough to hold a value for every possible
 * combination of row and column keys. (This is rarely optimal unless the table is extremely dense.)
 * Finally, every possible combination of row and column keys is always considered to have a value
 * associated with it: It is not possible to "remove" a value, only to replace it with {@code null},

 * characters.
 *
 * <p>As there are important reasons, including potential security issues, to handle Unicode
 * correctly if you are considering implementing a new escaper you should favor using UnicodeEscaper
 * wherever possible.
 *
 * <p>A {@code UnicodeEscaper} instance is required to be stateless, and safe when used concurrently
 * by multiple threads.
 *
 * <p>Popular escapers are defined as constants in classes like {@link

 * characters.
 *
 * <p>As there are important reasons, including potential security issues, to handle Unicode
 * correctly if you are considering implementing a new escaper you should favor using UnicodeEscaper
 * wherever possible.
 *
 * <p>A {@code UnicodeEscaper} instance is required to be stateless, and safe when used concurrently
 * by multiple threads.
 *
 * <p>Popular escapers are defined as constants in classes like {@link

    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("[", "{"));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // String.toUpperCase() has browser semantics
  public void testEqualsIgnoreCaseUnicodeEquivalence() {
    // Note that it's possible in future that the JDK's idea to toUpperCase() or equalsIgnoreCase()
    // may change and break assumptions in this test [*]. This is not a bug in the implementation of

    assertFalse(Ascii.equalsIgnoreCase("[", "{"));
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // String.toUpperCase() has browser semantics
  public void testEqualsIgnoreCaseUnicodeEquivalence() {
    // Note that it's possible in future that the JDK's idea to toUpperCase() or equalsIgnoreCase()
    // may change and break assumptions in this test [*]. This is not a bug in the implementation of

    assertTrue(concurrentlyMutatedList.getAllStates().contains(copyOfIterable));
  }

  private static void runConcurrentlyMutatedTest(WrapWithIterable wrap) {
    /*
     * TODO: Iterate over many array sizes and all possible operation lists,
     * performing adds and removes in different ways.
     */
    runConcurrentlyMutatedTest(elements(), ops(add(1), add(2)), wrap);

    runConcurrentlyMutatedTest(elements(), ops(add(1), nop()), wrap);

         * the JDK against TypeVariables returned by TypeResolver. To work with all JDK versions,
         * TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable implementation in each of the three
         * possible cases:
         *
         * 1. Under Android, the built-in TypeVariable implementation interoperates with ours.
         * Therefore, we can always create our own TypeVariable.
         *