You would probably do this just once, the first time, when setting everything up.

!!! tip
    This Domain Name part is way before HTTPS, but as everything depends on the domain and the IP address, it's worth mentioning it here.

### DNS

Now let's focus on all the actual HTTPS parts.

First, the browser would check with the **DNS servers** what is the **IP for the domain**, in this case, `someapp.example.com`.

        radix >= Character.MIN_RADIX && radix <= Character.MAX_RADIX,
        "radix (%s) must be between Character.MIN_RADIX and Character.MAX_RADIX",
        radix);
    // Benchmarks indicate this is probably not worth optimizing.
    return Integer.toString(toInt(x), radix);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the unsigned {@code byte} value represented by the given decimal string.
   *

	// simulate envoy send xds requests
	sendDownstreamWithNode(t, downstream, node)

	// after lds sent, the caching healthcheck will be resent
	expectCondition(status.StatusTrue)

	// Flip status back and forth, ensure we update
	proxy.sendHealthCheckRequest(healthy)
	expectCondition(status.StatusTrue)
	proxy.sendHealthCheckRequest(unhealthy)
	expectCondition(status.StatusFalse)
	proxy.sendHealthCheckRequest(healthy)

  public final <S extends @Nullable T> Equivalence<Iterable<S>> pairwise() {
    // Ideally, the returned equivalence would support Iterable<? extends T>. However,
    // the need for this is so rare that it's not worth making callers deal with the ugly wildcard.
    return new PairwiseEquivalence<>(this);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a predicate that evaluates to true if and only if the input is equivalent to {@code

        return none();
      case 1:
        return is(sequence.charAt(0));
      case 2:
        return isEither(sequence.charAt(0), sequence.charAt(1));
      default:
        // TODO(lowasser): is it potentially worth just going ahead and building a precomputed
        // matcher?
        return new AnyOf(sequence);
    }
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@code char} matcher that matches any BMP character not present in the given

			// interface, even though it isn't really asynchronous even if run in the
			// background.
			//
			// Nobody should be running 'echo' as a background command, but it's not worth
			// defining yet another interface, and also doesn't seem worth shoehorning
			// into a SimpleCommand the way we did with Wait.
			return func(*State) (stdout, stderr string, err error) {
				return out, "", nil
			}, nil
		})
}

	}
}

// scavenge scavenges nbytes worth of free pages, starting with the
// highest address first. Successive calls continue from where it left
// off until the heap is exhausted. force makes all memory available to
// scavenge, ignoring huge page heuristics.
//
// Returns the amount of memory scavenged in bytes.
//
// scavenge always tries to scavenge nbytes worth of memory, and will

            obvious way to ensure that.

            We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
            the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
        -->
        <test.add.opens>
          --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED
          --add-opens java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED

            obvious way to ensure that.

            We could consider arranging things so that only the tests we know need this would get
            the add-opens. Right now that doesn't seem worth the effort, though.
        -->
        <test.add.opens>
          --add-opens java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED
          --add-opens java.base/java.util=ALL-UNNAMED

	// full buffer and discarding an empty one. When we fill both
	// buffers, we shift the stack down by one work buffer by
	// bringing in a new empty buffer and discarding a full one.
	// This way we have one buffer's worth of hysteresis, which
	// amortizes the cost of getting or putting a work buffer over
	// at least one buffer of work and reduces contention on the
	// global work lists.
	//