* might be cancelled before we set the runner thread. That would make it impossible to
     * interrupt, yet it will still run, since interruptTask will leave the runner value null,
     * allowing the CAS below to succeed.
     */
    Thread currentThread = Thread.currentThread();
    if (!compareAndSet(null, currentThread)) {
      return; // someone else has run or is running.
    }

    boolean run = !isDone();

		host, port, err := extractHostPort(testCase.addr)
		if testCase.expectedErr == nil && err != nil {
			t.Fatalf("Test %d: should succeed but failed with err: %v", i+1, err)
		}
		if testCase.expectedErr != nil && err == nil {
			t.Fatalf("Test %d:, should fail but succeeded.", i+1)
		}
		if err == nil {
			if host != testCase.host {
				t.Fatalf("Test %d: expected: %v, found: %v", i+1, testCase.host, host)
			}

      }
      ArrayList<Integer> nodeList = new ArrayList<>(network.nodes());
      for (int i = 0; i < NUM_EDGES; ++i) {
        // Parallel edges are allowed, so this should always succeed.
        assertThat(
                network.addEdge(
                    getRandomElement(nodeList, gen), getRandomElement(nodeList, gen), new Object()))
            .isTrue();
      }

      }
      ArrayList<Integer> nodeList = new ArrayList<>(network.nodes());
      for (int i = 0; i < NUM_EDGES; ++i) {
        // Parallel edges are allowed, so this should always succeed.
        assertThat(
                network.addEdge(
                    getRandomElement(nodeList, gen), getRandomElement(nodeList, gen), new Object()))
            .isTrue();
      }

  It is more than simply understanding that m2 cannot go and check for the
  latest version of some snapshot artifact. If m2 is offline, SCM operations
  cannot succeed; no artifact downloads can take place, regardless of whether
  they are snapshot versions; artifact deployment cannot take place; certain
  types of tests cannot be setup, since the container used to run them cannot be

    }
  }

  @Test
  fun testRequestInvalid() {
    val call = client.newCall(Request("https://google.invalid/".toHttpUrl()))

    try {
      call.execute()
      fail("Request can't succeed")
    } catch (ioe: IOException) {
      assertThat(ioe).hasMessage("No results for google.invalid")
    }
  }

  @Test
  @Ignore("No results on CI for localhost")
  fun testDnsRequest() {

sleep 5

./mc admin policy info minio2 projecta >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to succeed, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi
./mc admin policy info minio3 projecta >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
	echo "expecting the command to succeed, exiting.."
	exit_1
fi

./mc admin policy remove minio3 projecta

sleep 10
./mc admin policy info minio1 projecta

   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a
   * setCount() no-op is permitted if either add() or remove() is permitted,
   * though we also allow it to "succeed" if neither is permitted.
   */

  private void assertSetCount(E element, int count) {
    setCountCheckReturnValue(element, count);

    assertEquals(

   * is permitted and similarly for decrease/remove(). We assume that a
   * setCount() no-op is permitted if either add() or remove() is permitted,
   * though we also allow it to "succeed" if neither is permitted.
   */

  private void assertSetCount(E element, int count) {
    setCountCheckReturnValue(element, count);

    assertEquals(

  public static <V extends @Nullable Object> V getDone(Future<V> future) throws ExecutionException {
    /*
     * We throw IllegalStateException, since the call could succeed later. Perhaps we "should" throw
     * IllegalArgumentException, since the call could succeed with a different argument. Those
     * exceptions' docs suggest that either is acceptable. Google's Java Practices page recommends