}

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_negative() {
    int dim1 = 1 << 16;
    int dim2 = 1 << 15;
    assertThat(dim1 * dim2).isLessThan(0);
    testConcat_overflow(dim1, dim2);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // different overflow behavior; could probably be made to work by using ~~
  public void testConcat_overflow_nonNegative() {

   * this precaution.
   *
   * In part because Cells are relatively large, we avoid creating
   * them until they are needed.  When there is no contention, all
   * updates are made to the base field.  Upon first contention (a
   * failed CAS on base update), the table is initialized to size 2.
   * The table size is doubled upon further contention until

     */
    Waiter(boolean unused) {}

    Waiter() {
      // avoid volatile write, write is made visible by subsequent CAS on waiters field
      ATOMIC_HELPER.putThread(this, Thread.currentThread());
    }

    // non-volatile write to the next field. Should be made visible by subsequent CAS on waiters
    // field.
    void setNext(@CheckForNull Waiter next) {

   * currently {@code expectedOldCount}. If {@code element} does not appear in the multiset exactly
   * {@code expectedOldCount} times, no changes will be made.
   *
   * @return {@code true} if the change was successful. This usually indicates that the multiset has
   *     been modified, but not always: in the case that {@code expectedOldCount == newCount}, the

 * Other contributors include Andrew Wright, Jeffrey Hayes,
 * Pat Fisher, Mike Judd.
 */

/*
 * Source:
 * http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/jsr166/src/test/tck/JSR166TestCase.java?revision=1.90
 * (We have made some trivial local modifications (commented out
 * uncompilable code).)
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;

      // There should be two CancellationException chained together.  The outer one should have the
      // stack trace of where the get() call was made, and the inner should have the stack trace of
      // where the immediateCancelledFuture() call was made.
      List<StackTraceElement> stackTrace = ImmutableList.copyOf(expected.getStackTrace());
      assertFalse(Iterables.any(stackTrace, hasClassName(CallerClass1.class)));

     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily cause a
     * concurrent read operation to see inconsistent data. This is made easier by the nature of the
     * read operations in Map. For example, no operation can reveal that the table has grown but the
     * threshold has not yet been updated, so there are no atomicity requirements for this with

    return result;
  }

  /*
   * Memory visibility of these fields. There are two cases to consider.
   *
   * 1. visibility of the writes to these fields to Fire.run:
   *
   * The initial write to delegateRef is made definitely visible via the semantics of
   * addListener/SES.schedule. The later racy write in cancel() is not guaranteed to be observed,
   * however that is fine since the correctness is based on the atomic state in our base class. The

   * this precaution.
   *
   * In part because Cells are relatively large, we avoid creating
   * them until they are needed.  When there is no contention, all
   * updates are made to the base field.  Upon first contention (a
   * failed CAS on base update), the table is initialized to size 2.
   * The table size is doubled upon further contention until

   * the {@code shutdownNow} method. First, "best-effort" with regards to canceling running tasks is
   * implemented as "no-effort". No interrupts or other attempts are made to stop threads executing
   * tasks. Second, the returned list will always be empty, as any submitted task is considered to
   * have started execution. This applies also to tasks given to {@code invokeAll} or {@code