* of the function, thus time. Thus, the RateLimiter becomes /faster/ after a period of
   * underutilization. If, on the other hand, we pick a function that goes /above/ that horizontal
   * line, then it means that the area (time) is increased, thus storedPermits are more costly than
   * fresh permits, thus the RateLimiter becomes /slower/ after a period of underutilization.
   *

import com.google.common.cache.TestingRemovalListeners.CountingRemovalListener;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests relating to cache eviction: what does and doesn't count toward maximumSize, what happens
 * when maximumSize is reached, etc.
 *
 * @author mike nonemacher
 */
public class CacheEvictionTest extends TestCase {
  static final int MAX_SIZE = 100;

    String data = "Hi There";

    checkSha1("b617318655057264e28bc0b6fb378c8ef146be00", key, data);
  }

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case2() {
    byte[] key = "Jefe".getBytes(UTF_8);
    String data = "what do ya want for nothing?";

    checkSha1("effcdf6ae5eb2fa2d27416d5f184df9c259a7c79", key, data);
  }

  public void testRfc2202_hmacSha1_case3() {
    byte[] key = fillByteArray(20, 0xaa);

      assertTrue(burst <= 1000);
      long afterBurst = measureTotalTimeMillis(limiter, oneSecWorthOfWork, new Random());
      // but work beyond that must take at least one second
      assertTrue(afterBurst >= 1000);
    }
  }

  /**
   * This neat test shows that no matter what weights we use in our requests, if we push X amount of
   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a

     * extra state from AbstractFuture), our options are limited: A call to setException() would be
     * a no-op. We could log, but if that's what we really want, we should modify
     * AbstractFuture.executeListener to do so, since that method would have the ability to continue
     * to execute other listeners.
     *

        assertWithMessage("roundToDouble(" + input + ", " + mode + ")")
            .that(BigIntegerMath.roundToDouble(input, mode))
            .isEqualTo(expectation);
      }

      if (!expectedValues.containsKey(UNNECESSARY)) {
        assertWithMessage("Expected roundUnnecessaryShouldThrow call")
            .that(unnecessaryShouldThrow)
            .isTrue();
        try {

        assertWithMessage("roundToDouble(" + input + ", " + mode + ")")
            .that(BigIntegerMath.roundToDouble(input, mode))
            .isEqualTo(expectation);
      }

      if (!expectedValues.containsKey(UNNECESSARY)) {
        assertWithMessage("Expected roundUnnecessaryShouldThrow call")
            .that(unnecessaryShouldThrow)
            .isTrue();
        try {

    }
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;

    }
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;

  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeFine2() {
    FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();

    // Sadly, the following is what users will have to do in some circumstances.

    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // safe covariant cast
    Optional<Number> first = (Optional<Number>) numbers.first();
    Number value = first.or(0.5); // fine
  }