* that use {@code comparator} to determine the least and greatest elements.
   */
  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): Change to Comparator<? super B> to permit Comparator<@Nullable ...> and
   * Comparator<SupertypeOfB>? What we have here matches the immutable collections, but those also
   * expose a public Builder constructor that accepts "? super." So maybe we should do *that*
   * instead.
   */

    }
  }

  /*
   * Whenever an implementation uses `instanceof` on a parameter instance, the test has to know that
   * (so much for "black box") and try instances that both do and don't pass the check. The "don't"
   * half of that is more awkward to arrange...
   */
  private static <T> Iterable<T> iterable(final Collection<T> collection) {
    // return collection::iterator;

        return true;
      }
      if (object instanceof ByteArrayAsList) {
        ByteArrayAsList that = (ByteArrayAsList) object;
        int size = size();
        if (that.size() != size) {
          return false;
        }
        for (int i = 0; i < size; i++) {
          if (array[start + i] != that.array[that.start + i]) {
            return false;
          }
        }
        return true;
      }

  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // NullPointerTester
  public void testNullPointers() {
    /*
     * Don't bother testing: Preconditions defines a bunch of methods that accept a template (or
     * even entire message) that simultaneously:
     *
     * - _shouldn't_ be null, so we don't annotate it with @Nullable
     *
     * - _can_ be null without causing a runtime failure (because we don't want the interesting

      return IntMath.sqrt((int) x, mode);
    }
    /*
     * Let k be the true value of floor(sqrt(x)), so that
     *
     *            k * k <= x          <  (k + 1) * (k + 1)
     * (double) (k * k) <= (double) x <= (double) ((k + 1) * (k + 1))
     *          since casting to double is nondecreasing.
     *          Note that the right-hand inequality is no longer strict.
     * Math.sqrt(k * k) <= Math.sqrt(x) <= Math.sqrt((k + 1) * (k + 1))

  @AndroidIncompatible // not clear that j.u.r.Matcher promises to handle mutations during use
  public void testSplitterIterableIsLazy_pattern() {
    if (!CommonPattern.isPcreLike()) {
      return;
    }
    assertSplitterIterableIsLazy(Splitter.onPattern(","));
  }

  /**
   * This test really pushes the boundaries of what we support. In general the splitter's behaviour

      HashCode that = (HashCode) object;
      return bits() == that.bits() && equalsSameBits(that);
    }
    return false;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a "Java hash code" for this {@code HashCode} instance; this is well-defined (so, for
   * example, you can safely put {@code HashCode} instances into a {@code HashSet}) but is otherwise
   * probably not what you want to use.
   */
  @Override

   * example, {@code a} and {@code b} could be {@code [2..4]} and {@code (1..5)}, or the empty
   * ranges {@code [3..3)} and {@code [4..4)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with the {@code asSet} view of a large
   * range set (such as {@code ImmutableRangeSet.of(Range.greaterThan(0))}). Certain operations on

   * example, {@code a} and {@code b} could be {@code [2..4]} and {@code (1..5)}, or the empty
   * ranges {@code [3..3)} and {@code [4..4)}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> Be extremely careful what you do with the {@code asSet} view of a large
   * range set (such as {@code ImmutableRangeSet.of(Range.greaterThan(0))}). Certain operations on

  }

  /**
   * Generates test cases for the given combination of scenario and timeouts. For methods that take
   * an explicit timeout value, all of the given timeoutsToUse result in individual test cases. For
   * methods that do not take an explicit timeout value, a single test case is generated only if the
   * implicit timeout of that method matches the given timeoutsToUse. For example, enter() is