import static org.eclipse.aether.impl.scope.BuildScopeQuery.singleton;
import static org.eclipse.aether.impl.scope.BuildScopeQuery.union;

/**
 * Maven3 scope configurations. Configures scope manager to support Maven3 scopes.
 * <p>
 * This manager supports the old Maven 3 dependency scopes.
 *
 * @since 2.0.0
 */
public final class Maven3ScopeManagerConfiguration implements ScopeManagerConfiguration {

import static org.eclipse.aether.impl.scope.BuildScopeQuery.singleton;
import static org.eclipse.aether.impl.scope.BuildScopeQuery.union;

/**
 * Maven4 scope configurations. Configures scope manager to support Maven4 scopes.
 * <p>
 * This manager supports all the new Maven 4 dependency scopes defined in {@link DependencyScope}.
 *
 * @since 2.0.0
 */
public final class Maven4ScopeManagerConfiguration implements ScopeManagerConfiguration {

     * Maven-Resolver without involving Maven Core and related things.
     * <p>
     * This type registry is NOT used by Maven Core: Maven replaces it during Session creation with a type registry
     * that supports extending it (i.e. via Maven Extensions).
     * <p>
     * Important: this "static" list of types should be in-sync with core provided types.
     */
    protected ArtifactTypeRegistry getArtifactTypeRegistry() {

          <description>
            Flags this Mojo as requiring information about the dependencies that would make up the specified class
            path. As the name suggests, this is similar to requiresDependencyResolution and supports the same values.
            The important difference is this will not resolve the files for the dependencies, i.e. the artifacts

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.api.services;

import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nonnull;

/**
 * Message builder that supports configurable styling.
 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 * @see MessageBuilderFactory
 */
public interface MessageBuilder extends Appendable {

    /**
     * Append message content in trace style.

    remote-only, and are therefore sensitive to offline mode.

** Maven-Artifact

  This is wholly dependent on Maven-Wagon, above.

  We could possibly use a flag on a particular Wagon to see whether it supports
  offline mode, and then test to see if the file-based basedir for an artifact
  repository works...if it doesn't work, we can mark that repository offline...

  <parent>
    <groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
    <artifactId>maven</artifactId>
    <version>4.0.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT</version>
  </parent>

  <artifactId>maven-builder-support</artifactId>

  <name>Maven Builder Support</name>
  <description>Support for descriptor builders (model, setting, toolchains)</description>

  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.internal.impl.model.profile;

import java.util.Locale;
import java.util.stream.Stream;

/**
 * OS support
 */
public class Os {

    /**
     * The OS Name.
     */
    public static final String OS_NAME = System.getProperty("os.name").toLowerCase(Locale.ENGLISH);

    /**
     * The OA architecture.

                }
            }
        }
        return list;
    }

    /**
     * Returns the elements placed on the classpath for compilation.
     * This method can be invoked when the caller does not support module-path.
     *
     * @throws DependencyResolutionRequiredException if an artifact file is used, but has not been resolved
     *

            return ValidationReportLevel.valueOf(level.toUpperCase(Locale.ENGLISH));
        } catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
            logger.warn(
                    "Invalid value specified for property {}: '{}'. Supported values are (case insensitive): {}",
                    MAVEN_PLUGIN_VALIDATION_KEY,
                    level,
                    Arrays.toString(ValidationReportLevel.values()));