assertEquals(
        "next() should still return first element after peeking", "A", peekingIterator.next());

    assertEquals("Should be able to peek() at middle element", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "Should be able to peek() middle element multiple times", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "next() should still return middle element after peeking", "B", peekingIterator.next());

```Python hl_lines="1  7-12  19-20"
{!../../../docs_src/dataclasses/tutorial001.py!}
```

This is still supported thanks to **Pydantic**, as it has <a href="https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/concepts/dataclasses/#use-of-stdlib-dataclasses-with-basemodel" class="external-link" target="_blank">internal support for `dataclasses`</a>.

    assertEquals(
        "next() should still return first element after peeking", "A", peekingIterator.next());

    assertEquals("Should be able to peek() at middle element", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "Should be able to peek() middle element multiple times", "B", peekingIterator.peek());
    assertEquals(
        "next() should still return middle element after peeking", "B", peekingIterator.next());

  // the call, but they may be accessed by other threads for duplex requests.

  /** True if this call still has a request body open. */
  private var requestBodyOpen = false

  /** True if this call still has a response body open. */
  private var responseBodyOpen = false

  /** True if there are more exchanges expected for this call. */

   * response body is [closed][ResponseBody]. The recipient of the callback may consume the response
   * body on another thread.
   *
   * Note that transport-layer success (receiving a HTTP response code, headers and body) does not
   * necessarily indicate application-layer success: `response` may still indicate an unhappy HTTP
   * response code like 404 or 500.
   */

    endsFirst.start()
    endsFirst.join()
    // First response is still waiting.
    assertThat(firstResponseCode.get()).isEqualTo(0)
    // Second response is done.
    assertThat(secondResponseCode.get()).isEqualTo(200)
    latch.countDown()
    startsFirst.join()
    // And now it's done!
    assertThat(firstResponseCode.get()).isEqualTo(200)
    // (Still done).
    assertThat(secondResponseCode.get()).isEqualTo(200)
  }

   *     accepts a cause: Users of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null
   *     cause. At the moment, you can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit
   *     {@code null} cause. Note, however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents
   *     anyone from calling {@link #initCause} later, so it is not quite equivalent to using a

!!! tip
    But it is still recommended to use the ideas above, using multiple classes, instead of these parameters.

    This is because the JSON Schema generated in your app's OpenAPI (and the docs) will still be the one for the complete model, even if you use `response_model_include` or `response_model_exclude` to omit some attributes.

        example: Annotated[
            Optional[Any],
            deprecated(
                "Deprecated in OpenAPI 3.1.0 that now uses JSON Schema 2020-12, "
                "although still supported. Use examples instead."
            ),
        ] = _Unset,
        openapi_examples: Optional[Dict[str, Example]] = None,
        deprecated: Union[deprecated, str, bool, None] = None,

   *
   * @deprecated Prefer {@linkplain ExecutionError(Error)} a constructor that accepts a cause: Users
   *     of this class typically expect for instances to have a non-null cause. At the moment, you
   *     can <i>usually</i> still preserve behavior by passing an explicit {@code null} cause. Note,
   *     however, that passing an explicit {@code null} cause prevents anyone from calling {@link