### DNS

Konzentrieren wir uns nun auf alle tatsächlichen HTTPS-Aspekte.

Zuerst würde der Browser mithilfe der **DNS-Server** herausfinden, welches die **IP für die Domain** ist, in diesem Fall für `someapp.example.com`.

Die DNS-Server geben dem Browser eine bestimmte **IP-Adresse** zurück. Das wäre die von Ihrem Server verwendete öffentliche IP-Adresse, die Sie in den DNS-Servern konfiguriert haben.

### DNS

Теперь давайте сфокусируемся на работе с HTTPS.

Всё начинается с того, что браузер спрашивает у **DNS-серверов**, какой **IP-адрес связан с доменом**, для примера возьмём домен `someapp.example.com`.

DNS-сервера присылают браузеру определённый **IP-адрес**, тот самый публичный IP-адрес вашего сервера, который вы указали в ресурсной "записи А" при настройке.

<img src="/img/deployment/https/https01.svg">

  if (TF_GetCode(status) != TF_OK) {
    fprintf(stderr, "TF_CloseWritableFile failed: %s\n", TF_Message(status));
  }
  TF_StringStreamDone(s);

  TF_KernelBuilder* b =
      TF_NewKernelBuilder("SomeOp", "SomeDevice", &create, &compute, NULL);
  TF_RegisterKernelBuilder("someKernel", b, status);

  TF_DeleteStatus(status);
  return 0;

            could postprocess Collect.gwt.xml to add <skip> lines for all the files that should be
            covered by testModule.gwt.xml. Maybe I'll try it someday.

            [*] https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ResourceOracle#When_multiple_PathPrefix_es_have_the_same_path
                https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7581

            return "cause=[Someday...]";
          }
        };
    AbstractFuture<Object> testFuture3 = new AbstractFuture<Object>() {};
    testFuture3.setFuture(testFuture2);
    assertThat(testFuture3.toString())
        .matches(
            "[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING, setFuture=\\[[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING,"
                + " info=\\[cause=\\[Someday...]]]]]");
    testFuture2.set("result string");

            return "cause=[Someday...]";
          }
        };
    AbstractFuture<Object> testFuture3 = new AbstractFuture<Object>() {};
    testFuture3.setFuture(testFuture2);
    assertThat(testFuture3.toString())
        .matches(
            "[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING, setFuture=\\[[^\\[]+\\[status=PENDING,"
                + " info=\\[cause=\\[Someday...]]]]]");
    testFuture2.set("result string");

    try {
      range.intersection(Range.open(3, 5));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
      // TODO(kevinb): convert the rest of this file to Truth someday
      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
    }
    try {
      range.intersection(Range.closed(0, 2));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {

    try {
      range.intersection(Range.open(3, 5));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
      // TODO(kevinb): convert the rest of this file to Truth someday
      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
    }
    try {
      range.intersection(Range.closed(0, 2));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {

     * past them.)
     *
     * We could consider "lying" and omitting @CheckNotNull from all these fields. Normally, I'm not
     * a fan of that: What if we someday implement (presumably to be enabled during tests only)
     * bytecode rewriting that checks for any null value that passes through an API with a