try {
      range.intersection(Range.open(3, 5));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
      // TODO(kevinb): convert the rest of this file to Truth someday
      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
    }
    try {
      range.intersection(Range.closed(0, 2));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {

     * past them.)
     *
     * We could consider "lying" and omitting @CheckNotNull from all these fields. Normally, I'm not
     * a fan of that: What if we someday implement (presumably to be enabled during tests only)
     * bytecode rewriting that checks for any null value that passes through an API with a

    try {
      range.intersection(Range.open(3, 5));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {
      // TODO(kevinb): convert the rest of this file to Truth someday
      assertThat(expected).hasMessageThat().contains("connected");
    }
    try {
      range.intersection(Range.closed(0, 2));
      fail();
    } catch (IllegalArgumentException expected) {

            could postprocess Collect.gwt.xml to add <skip> lines for all the files that should be
            covered by testModule.gwt.xml. Maybe I'll try it someday.

            [*] https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/ResourceOracle#When_multiple_PathPrefix_es_have_the_same_path
                https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7581