<img src="/img/tutorial/dependencies/image02.png">

## Shortcut { #shortcut }

But you see that we are having some code repetition here, writing `CommonQueryParams` twice:

//// tab | Python 3.8+

```Python
commons: Annotated[CommonQueryParams, Depends(CommonQueryParams)]
```

////

//// tab | Python 3.8+ non-Annotated

 *  * [onHeaders] (unless canceled)
 *  * [onData] (optional sequence of data frames)
 *
 * As a stream ID is scoped to a single HTTP/2 connection, implementations which target multiple
 * connections should expect repetition of stream IDs.
 *
 * Return true to request cancellation of a pushed stream.  Note that this does not guarantee
 * future frames won't arrive on the stream ID.
 */
interface PushObserver {
  /**

* Have shared logic (the same code logic again and again).
* Share database connections.
* Enforce security, authentication, role requirements, etc.
* And many other things...

All these, while minimizing code repetition.

## First Steps { #first-steps }

Let's see a very simple example. It will be so simple that it is not very useful, for now.

But this way we can focus on how the **Dependency Injection** system works.

It has an integrated dependency injection system, inspired by Angular 2. It requires pre-registering the "injectables" (like all the other dependency injection systems I know), so, it adds to the verbosity and code repetition.

As the parameters are described with TypeScript types (similar to Python type hints), editor support is quite good.

Il possède un système d'injection de dépendances intégré, inspiré d'Angular 2. Il nécessite de pré-enregistrer les "injectables" (comme tous les autres systèmes d'injection de dépendances que je connais), donc, cela ajoute à la verbosité et à la répétition du code.

Comme les paramètres sont décrits avec des types TypeScript (similaires aux type hints de Python), la prise en charge
par l'éditeur est assez bonne.

Group       = "(" Expression ")" .
Option      = "[" Expression "]" .
Repetition  = "{" Expression "}" .
</pre>

<p>
Productions are expressions constructed from terms and the following
operators, in increasing precedence:
</p>
<pre class="grammar">
|   alternation
()  grouping
[]  option (0 or 1 times)
{}  repetition (0 to n times)
</pre>

<p>

 * </ul>
 *
 * @author Jim McMaster
 * @author Jige Yu
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public final class EqualsTester {
  private static final int REPETITIONS = 3;

  private final List<List<Object>> equalityGroups = new ArrayList<>();
  private final RelationshipTester.ItemReporter itemReporter;

  /** Constructs an empty EqualsTester instance */
  public EqualsTester() {

 * to explicitly add another equivalence group.
 *
 * @author Gregory Kick
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public final class EquivalenceTester<T> {
  private static final int REPETITIONS = 3;

  private final Equivalence<? super T> equivalence;
  private final RelationshipTester<T> delegate;
  private final List<T> items = new ArrayList<>();

<img src="/img/tutorial/dependencies/image02.png">

## Atajo

Pero ves que estamos teniendo algo de repetición de código aquí, escribiendo `CommonQueryParams` dos veces:

//// tab | Python 3.8+

```Python
commons: Annotated[CommonQueryParams, Depends(CommonQueryParams)]
```

////

 * </ul>
 *
 * @author Jim McMaster
 * @author Jige Yu
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public final class EqualsTester {
  private static final int REPETITIONS = 3;

  private final List<List<Object>> equalityGroups = new ArrayList<>();
  private final RelationshipTester.ItemReporter itemReporter;

  /** Constructs an empty EqualsTester instance */
  public EqualsTester() {