*/
    if (throwable instanceof Error) {
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): Do we really want to log this if we called setException(throwable) and it
       * returned true? This was intentional (CL 46470009), but it seems odd compared to how we
       * normally handle Error.
       *
       * Similarly, do we really want to log the same Error more than once?
       */
      log(throwable);
    }
  }

        ClassRealm projectRealm = currentProject.getClassRealm();
        if (projectRealm != null) {
            Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(projectRealm);
        }
    }

    // TODO I'm really wondering where this method belongs; smells like it should be on MavenProject, but for some
    // reason it isn't ? This localization is kind-of a code smell.

    public static String getKey(MavenProject project) {

 * test with reference to the same "lock-like object", and then their interactions with that object
 * are choreographed via the various methods on this class.
 *
 * <p>A "lock-like object" is really any object that may be used for concurrency control. If the
 * {@link #callAndAssertBlocks} method is ever called in a test, the lock-like object must have a

            // this is not too good, probably should better pass the address and check that it is a netbios one.
            // While we could look up the domain controller/KDC we cannot really make the java kerberos implementation
            // use a KDC of our choice.
            // A potential workaround would be to try to get the server FQDN by reverse lookup, but this might have

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableLongArray.of(1, 3))
        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableLongArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableLongArray iia = ImmutableLongArray.of(0, 1, 3);
    assertDoesntActuallyTrim(iia);

        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableDoubleArray.of(1, 3))
        .addEqualityGroup(ImmutableDoubleArray.of(1, 2, 3))
        .testEquals();
  }

  /**
   * This is probably a weird and hacky way to test what we're really trying to test, but hey, it
   * caught a bug.
   */
  public void testTrimmed() {
    ImmutableDoubleArray iia = ImmutableDoubleArray.of(0, 1, 3);
    assertDoesntActuallyTrim(iia);

    String test = "Test string for NullOutputStream";
    byte[] bytes = test.getBytes(Charsets.US_ASCII);
    nos.write(bytes);
    nos.write(bytes, 2, 10);
    nos.write(bytes, bytes.length - 5, 5);
    // nothing really to assert?
    assertSame(ByteStreams.nullOutputStream(), ByteStreams.nullOutputStream());
  }

  public void testNullOutputStream_exceptions() throws Exception {
    OutputStream nos = ByteStreams.nullOutputStream();

          }
        },
        directExecutor());
    manager.startAsync();
    afterStarted.countDown();
    // We do not call awaitHealthy because, due to races, that method may throw an exception.  But
    // we really just want to wait for the thread to be in the failure callback so we wait for that
    // explicitly instead.
    failEnter.await();
    assertFalse("State should be updated before calling listeners", manager.isHealthy());

        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
        Comparator<byte[]> comparator = (Comparator<byte[]>) constants[0];
        return comparator;
      } catch (Throwable t) { // ensure we really catch *everything*
        return lexicographicalComparatorJavaImpl();
      }
    }
  }

  private static byte flip(byte b) {
    return (byte) (b ^ 0x80);
  }

  /**

  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // threads
  public void testOverflowTimeout() throws Exception {
    // First, sanity check that naive multiplication would really overflow to a negative number:
    long nanosPerSecond = NANOSECONDS.convert(1, SECONDS);
    assertThat(nanosPerSecond * Long.MAX_VALUE).isLessThan(0L);