}},
			},
			expect: true,
		},
		{
			desc: "listener-pipe",
			inFilter: &ListenerFilter{
				Address: "",
				Port:    0,
				Type:    "",
			},
			inListener: &listener.Listener{
				Address: &core.Address{
					Address: &core.Address_Pipe{
						Pipe: &core.Pipe{Path: "unix:///dev/shm/uds.socket"},
					},
				},
			},
			expect: true,
		},
	}

    source2!!.close()
    assertThat(relay.isClosed).isTrue()
    assertFile(Relay.PREFIX_DIRTY, -1L, -1, null, null)
  }

  @Test
  fun racingReaders() {
    val pipe = Pipe(1024)
    val sink = pipe.sink.buffer()
    val relay = edit(file, pipe.source, metadata, 5)
    val future1 = executor.submit(sourceReader(relay.newSource()))
    val future2 = executor.submit(sourceReader(relay.newSource()))
    Thread.sleep(500)

	// Race condition is because of io.PipeWriter implementation. i.e consider the following
	// sequent of operations:
	// 1) pipe.Write()
	// 2) pipe.Close()
	// Now pipe.Close() can return before the data is read on the other end of the pipe and written to the disk
	// Hence an immediate Read() on the file can return incorrect data.
	if b.canClose != nil {
		b.canClose.Wait()
	}
	return err
}

  // zero effect on the behavior of the WebSocket API which is why tests are only written once
  // from the perspective of a single peer.
  private val random = Random(0)
  private val client2Server = Pipe(8192L)
  private val server2client = Pipe(8192L)
  private val taskFaker = TaskFaker()
  private val client = TestStreams(true, taskFaker, server2client, client2Server)
  private val server = TestStreams(false, taskFaker, client2Server, server2client)

./mc mb sitea/delissue --insecure

./mc version enable sitea/delissue --insecure

echo hello | ./mc pipe sitea/delissue/hello --insecure

./mc version suspend sitea/delissue --insecure

./mc rm sitea/delissue/hello --insecure

./mc version enable sitea/delissue --insecure

echo hello | ./mc pipe sitea/delissue/hello --insecure

./mc version suspend sitea/delissue --insecure

            :warning: 'There are new TODOs present in this change.  Should any be removed?'

# To simplify the automations section, some calculations are placed under unique YAML keys defined here.
# Read the "|" not as "or", but as a "pipe", taking the output of the previous command and passing it to the next command.
# This section could also appear ahead of the automations section.

colors:

# exec".
# Important: "tfrun foo | bar" is "( tfrun foo ) | bar", not "tfrun (foo | bar)".
# Therefore, "tfrun" commands cannot include pipes -- which is
# probably for the better. If a pipe is necessary for something, it is probably
# complex. Write a well-documented script under utilities/ to encapsulate the
# functionality instead.
tfrun() { "$@"; }

      - action: set-required-approvals@v1
        args:
          approvals: 2

# To simplify the automations section, some calculations are placed under unique YAML keys defined here.
# Read the "|" not as "or", but as a "pipe", taking the output of the previous command and passing it to the next command.
# This section could also appear ahead of the automations section.

# To simplify the automations section, some calculations are placed under unique YAML keys defined here.
# Read the "|" not as "or", but as a "pipe", taking the output of the previous command and passing it to the next command.
# This section could also appear ahead of the automations section.

# script to run pip-compile for keras, tensorboard, estimator deps.
# if there is a change in requirements.in then all lock files will be updated
# accordingly.

# -e: abort script if one command fails
# -u: error if undefined variable used
# -o pipefail: entire command fails if pipe fails. watch out for yes | ...
# -o history: record shell history
set -euo pipefail -o history