// byte arrays sized based on width.
func NewBytePoolCap(maxSize uint64, width int, capwidth int) (bp *BytePoolCap) {
	if capwidth > 0 && capwidth < 64 {
		panic("buffer capped with smaller than 64 bytes is not supported")
	}
	if capwidth > 0 && width > capwidth {
		panic("buffer length cannot be > capacity of the buffer")
	}
	return &BytePoolCap{
		c:    make(chan []byte, maxSize),
		w:    width,
		wcap: capwidth,
	}
}

	}
	logJSON, err := json.Marshal(&log.Entry{
		Level:   FatalKind,
		Message: message,
		Time:    time.Now().UTC(),
		Trace:   &log.Trace{Message: message, Source: []string{getSource(6)}},
	})
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}
	fmt.Fprintln(Output, string(logJSON))
	ExitFunc(1)
}

func (f fatalMsg) quiet(msg string, args ...interface{}) {
	f.pretty(msg, args...)
}

var (
	logTag      = "ERROR"

			// Infinite blocking op
			<-make(chan struct{})
		}

		// Override the logger os.Exit()
		logger.ExitFunc = freeze

		defer func() {
			if err := recover(); err != nil {
				fmt.Println("panic:", err)
				fmt.Println("")
				fmt.Println(string(debug.Stack()))
			}
			freeze(-1)
		}()
	}

	// Run the app - exit on error.
	if err := newApp(appName).Run(args); err != nil {

    * But it provides you the tools to build simple web applications, with routing based on paths, etc.
    * If you are comparing Starlette, compare it against Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. Web frameworks (or microframeworks).
* **FastAPI**:
    * The same way that Starlette uses Uvicorn and cannot be faster than it, **FastAPI** uses Starlette, so it cannot be faster than it.

    * 如果你沒有使用 FastAPI 而是直接使用 Starlette（或其他工具，如 Sanic、Flask、Responder 等），你將必須自行實現所有資料驗證和序列化。因此，你的最終應用程式仍然具有與使用 FastAPI 建置相同的開銷。在許多情況下，這種資料驗證...