private LittleEndianDataOutputStream out = new LittleEndianDataOutputStream(baos);

  public void testWriteLittleEndian() throws IOException {

    /* Write out various test values in LITTLE ENDIAN FORMAT */
    out.write(new byte[] {-100, 100});
    out.writeBoolean(true);
    out.writeBoolean(false);
    out.writeByte(100);
    out.writeByte(-100);
    out.writeByte((byte) 200);
    out.writeChar('a');

       *
       */
      String arch = System.getProperty("os.arch");
      if ("amd64".equals(arch)) {
        theGetter =
            ByteOrder.nativeOrder().equals(ByteOrder.LITTLE_ENDIAN)
                ? UnsafeByteArray.UNSAFE_LITTLE_ENDIAN
                : UnsafeByteArray.UNSAFE_BIG_ENDIAN;
      }
    } catch (Throwable t) {
      // ensure we really catch *everything*
    }
    byteArray = theGetter;
  }

   * {@code int} value in little-endian order.
   *
   * @throws IllegalStateException if {@code bits() < 32}
   */
  public abstract int asInt();

  /**
   * Returns the first eight bytes of {@linkplain #asBytes() this hashcode's bytes}, converted to a
   * {@code long} value in little-endian order.
   *
   * @throws IllegalStateException if {@code bits() < 64}
   */

          // For convenience, testing only with big endianness, to match DataOutputStream.
          // I regard highly unlikely that both the little endianness tests above and this one
          // passes, and there is still a little endianness bug lurking around.
        }
      }

      Control control = new Control();
      Hasher controlSink = control.newHasher(1024);

   * little-endian byte order.
   *
   * @throws IOException if an I/O error occurs
   */
  @Override
  public void writeChar(int v) throws IOException {
    writeShort(v);
  }

  /**
   * Writes a {@code String} as specified by {@link DataOutputStream#writeChars(String)}, except
   * each character is written using little-endian byte order.
   *

/** @author Jesse Wilson */
final class Platform {
  static CharMatcher precomputeCharMatcher(CharMatcher matcher) {
    // CharMatcher.precomputed() produces CharMatchers that are maybe a little
    // faster (and that's debatable), but definitely more memory-hungry. We're
    // choosing to turn .precomputed() into a no-op in GWT, because it doesn't
    // seem to be a worthwhile tradeoff in a browser.

 * this annotation specifies each of the different sizes for which a test suite should be built. (In
 * a typical case, the features should include {@link CollectionSize#ANY}.) These semantics are thus
 * a little different from those of other Collection-related features such as {@link
 * CollectionFeature} or {@link SetFeature}.
 *
 * <p>However, when {@link CollectionSize.Require} is used to annotate a test it behaves normally

   * Visited Nodes = {N1, N2, N3}
   * EndpointPair [N4, N4] - return
   * Visited Nodes = {N1, N2, N3, N4}
   * </pre>
   */
  private static final class Undirected<N> extends EndpointPairIterator<N> {
    // It's a little weird that we add `null` to this set, but it makes for slightly simpler code.
    @CheckForNull private Set<@Nullable N> visitedNodes;

    private Undirected(BaseGraph<N> graph) {
      super(graph);

    private NbtAddress queryAddress;

    private int numberOfNames;
    private byte[] macAddress;
    private byte[] stats;

    NbtAddress[] addressArray;

    /* It is a little awkward but prudent to pass the quering address
     * so that it may be included in the list of results. IOW we do
     * not want to create a new NbtAddress object for this particular

/**
 * Unit tests for {@link HashCode}.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class HashCodeTest extends TestCase {
  // note: asInt(), asLong() are in little endian
  private static final ImmutableList<ExpectedHashCode> expectedHashCodes =
      ImmutableList.of(
          new ExpectedHashCode(
              new byte[] {