!!! tip
    Notice the autocompletion for `name` and `price`, that was defined in the FastAPI application, in the `Item` model.

You will have inline errors for the data that you send:

<img src="/img/tutorial/generate-clients/image04.png">

The response object will also have autocompletion:

<img src="/img/tutorial/generate-clients/image05.png">

## FastAPI App with Tags

```Python hl_lines="2"
@app.get('/')
def results():
    results = some_library()
    return results
```

---

	}

	for _, count := range vidMap {
		// do we have enough common versions
		// that have enough quorum to satisfy
		// the etag.
		if count >= quorum {
			return etags
		}
	}

	return make([]string, len(partsMetadata))
}

// Extracts list of times from FileInfo slice and returns, skips
// slice elements which have errors.

   * we're guaranteed to have properly initialized the subclass.
   */
  final void init() {
    /*
     * requireNonNull is safe because this is called from the constructor after `futures` is set but
     * before releaseResources could be called (because we have not yet set up any of the listeners

    But `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm` is just a class dependency that you could have written yourself, or you could have declared `Form` parameters directly.

    But as it's a common use case, it is provided by **FastAPI** directly, just to make it easier.

### Use the form data

!!! tip

Then you could want to have **a single container** with a **process manager** starting **several worker processes** inside.

#### Prometheus and Other Reasons

What inspired **FastAPI**, how it compares to alternatives and what it learned from them.

## Intro

**FastAPI** wouldn't exist if not for the previous work of others.

There have been many tools created before that have helped inspire its creation.

I have been avoiding the creation of a new framework for several years. First I tried to solve all the features covered by **FastAPI** using many different frameworks, plug-ins, and tools.

    # then two meshes must have different Mesh IDs:
    # - Meshes will have their telemetry aggregated in one place
    # - Meshes will be federated together
    # - Policy will be written referencing one mesh from the other
    #
    # If an administrator expects that any of these conditions may become true in
    # the future, they should ensure their meshes have different Mesh IDs
    # assigned.
    #

  private final transient int size;

  /*
   * We have some considerable complexity in these create methods because of
   * Builder.buildKeepingLast(). The same Builder might be called with buildKeepingLast() and then
   * buildOrThrow(), or vice versa. So in particular, if we modify alternatingKeysAndValues to
   * eliminate duplicate keys (for buildKeepingLast()) then we have to ensure that a later call to

!!! info
    Unfortunately, I can't simply trust PRs that just have several approvals.

    Several times it has happened that there are PRs with 3, 5 or more approvals, probably because the description is appealing, but when I check the PRs, they are actually broken, have a bug, or don't solve the problem they claim to solve. 😅