```Python hl_lines="2"
@app.get('/')
def results():
    results = some_library()
    return results
```

---

    But `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm` is just a class dependency that you could have written yourself, or you could have declared `Form` parameters directly.

    But as it's a common use case, it is provided by **FastAPI** directly, just to make it easier.

### Use the form data

!!! tip

!!! tip
    Notice the autocompletion for `name` and `price`, that was defined in the FastAPI application, in the `Item` model.

You will have inline errors for the data that you send:

<img src="/img/tutorial/generate-clients/image04.png">

The response object will also have autocompletion:

<img src="/img/tutorial/generate-clients/image05.png">

## FastAPI App with Tags

Then you could want to have **a single container** with a **process manager** starting **several worker processes** inside.

#### Prometheus and Other Reasons

  private final transient int size;

  /*
   * We have some considerable complexity in these create methods because of
   * Builder.buildKeepingLast(). The same Builder might be called with buildKeepingLast() and then
   * buildOrThrow(), or vice versa. So in particular, if we modify alternatingKeysAndValues to
   * eliminate duplicate keys (for buildKeepingLast()) then we have to ensure that a later call to

!!! info
    Unfortunately, I can't simply trust PRs that just have several approvals.

    Several times it has happened that there are PRs with 3, 5 or more approvals, probably because the description is appealing, but when I check the PRs, they are actually broken, have a bug, or don't solve the problem they claim to solve. 😅

What inspired **FastAPI**, how it compares to alternatives and what it learned from them.

## Intro

**FastAPI** wouldn't exist if not for the previous work of others.

There have been many tools created before that have helped inspire its creation.

I have been avoiding the creation of a new framework for several years. First I tried to solve all the features covered by **FastAPI** using many different frameworks, plug-ins, and tools.

        return true
      }
    }

    // If we have a routes left, use 'em.
    if (routeSelection?.hasNext() == true) return true

    // If we haven't initialized the route selector yet, assume it'll have at least one route.
    val localRouteSelector = routeSelector ?: return true

    // If we do have a route selector, use its routes.
    return localRouteSelector.hasNext()
  }

  /**

        }

        // After the collection we will have the artifact object in the result but they will not be resolved yet.
        result = artifactCollector.collect(
                artifacts, rootArtifact, managedVersions, collectionRequest, source, collectionFilter, listeners, null);

        // We have metadata retrieval problems, or there are cycles that have been detected

In this case, it would be better to get **one extra server** and run some processes on it so that they all have **enough RAM and CPU time**.

There's also the chance that for some reason you have a **spike** of usage of your API. Maybe it went viral, or maybe some other services or bots start using it. And you might want to have extra resources to be safe in those cases.