assertEquals("DRguest", permissionHelper.encode("(deny){role}guest"));
        assertEquals("D2guest", permissionHelper.encode("(deny){group}guest"));
        assertEquals("D1guest", permissionHelper.encode("(deny){USER}guest"));
        assertEquals("DRguest", permissionHelper.encode("(deny){ROLE}guest"));
        assertEquals("D2guest", permissionHelper.encode("(deny){GROUP}guest"));

          CharStreams.copy(reader, sb);
        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases

          CharStreams.copy(reader, sb);
        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this
    // one. (StringCoding$StringDecoder vs. StreamDecoder).  StringCoding has a ton of special cases

   * a CountdownLatch).
   */
  @Throws(InterruptedException::class)
  abstract fun dispatch(request: RecordedRequest): MockResponse

  /**
   * Returns an early guess of the next response, used for policy on how an incoming request should
   * be received. The default implementation returns an empty response. Mischievous implementations

              SmbSession sess = trans.unwrap(SmbTransportInternal.class).getSmbSession(c, getTestServer(), null);
              SmbTreeInternal tree = sess.unwrap(SmbSessionInternal.class).getSmbTree(getTestShare(), null).unwrap(SmbTreeInternal.class) ) {

            if ( trans.isSMB2() ) {
                Smb2CreateRequest create = new Smb2CreateRequest(sess.getConfig(), "\\foocc");

    assertExpectedBytes(out.toByteArray());
  }

  public void testCopyTo_byteSink() throws IOException {
    final ByteArrayOutputStream out = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
    // HERESY! but it's ok just for this I guess
    source.copyTo(
        new ByteSink() {
          @Override
          public OutputStream openStream() throws IOException {
            return out;
          }
        });

	"net/http/httptest"
	"net/url"
	"strconv"
	"testing"

	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/crypto"
	"github.com/minio/minio/internal/grid"
	xhttp "github.com/minio/minio/internal/http"
)

// Tests request guess function for net/rpc requests.
func TestGuessIsRPC(t *testing.T) {
	if guessIsRPCReq(nil) {
		t.Fatal("Unexpected return for nil request")
	}

	u, err := url.Parse("http://localhost:9000/minio/lock")
	if err != nil {

    assertExpectedBytes(out.toByteArray());
  }

  public void testCopyTo_byteSink() throws IOException {
    final ByteArrayOutputStream out = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
    // HERESY! but it's ok just for this I guess
    source.copyTo(
        new ByteSink() {
          @Override
          public OutputStream openStream() throws IOException {
            return out;
          }
        });

```

But by using the `secrets.compare_digest()` it will be secure against a type of attacks called "timing attacks".

### Timing Attacks

But what's a "timing attack"?

Let's imagine some attackers are trying to guess the username and password.

And they send a request with a username `johndoe` and a password `love123`.

Then the Python code in your application would be equivalent to something like:

```Python

 plugin parameters and anything else.

 We once had a document that Vincent and I agreed upon and I was about to
 implement it and then I disappeared for 8 months so it never came to pass.

 So I guess it's important to figure out what people are using properties
 files for and see if we can't incorporate it all into the POM. Or if we do
 have properties file (something I would like to avoid) say they don't