has good test coverage, so look at some existing tests if you're unsure
     how to go about it.
  2. All contributions must be licensed Apache 2.0 and all files must have a
     copy of the boilerplate license comment (can be copied from an existing
     file).
  3. Files should be formatted according to Google's [Java style guide][].
  4. Please squash all commits for a change into a single commit (this can be

     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }
    executor.shutdown();
  }

     * including in MapRetrievalCache, so I'm not sure why this one is different. I did at least
     * confirm that my change to MapIteratorCache fixes the TSAN error in the (larger) test it was
     * originally reported in.
     */
    for (Future<?> future : futures.build()) {
      future.get();
    }
    executor.shutdown();
  }

 *
 * <p>{@link java.nio.file.Path} users will find similar utilities in {@link MoreFiles} and the
 * JDK's {@link java.nio.file.Files} class.
 *
 * @author Chris Nokleberg
 * @author Colin Decker
 * @since 1.0
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public final class Files {

  private Files() {}

  /**

   *
   * <p>This method is called {@code murmur3_32_fixed} because it fixes a bug in the {@code
   * HashFunction} returned by the original {@code murmur3_32} method.
   *
   * @since 31.0
   */
  public static HashFunction murmur3_32_fixed() {
    return Murmur3_32HashFunction.MURMUR3_32_FIXED;
  }

  /**
   * Returns a hash function implementing the <a

    }
    assertHash(expected, murmur3_32_fixed().hashString(string, charset));
    assertHash(expected, murmur3_32().newHasher().putString(string, charset).hash());
    assertHash(expected, murmur3_32_fixed().newHasher().putString(string, charset).hash());
    assertHash(expected, murmur3_32().hashBytes(string.getBytes(charset)));
    assertHash(expected, murmur3_32_fixed().hashBytes(string.getBytes(charset)));

    /**
     * Scans this location and returns all scanned resources.
     *
     * <p>This file and jar files from "Class-Path" entry in the scanned manifest files will be
     * added to {@code scannedFiles}.
     *
     * <p>A file will be scanned at most once even if specified multiple times by one or multiple
     * jar files' "Class-Path" manifest entries. Particularly, if a jar file from the "Class-Path"

      }
    } finally {
      in.close();
    }
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  private boolean delete(File file) {
    if (file.isDirectory()) {
      File[] files = file.listFiles();
      if (files != null) {
        for (File f : files) {
          if (!delete(f)) {
            return false;
          }
        }
      }
    }

    if (!file.delete()) {

import static com.google.common.io.MoreFiles.deleteRecursively;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import static java.nio.file.Files.createDirectory;
import static java.nio.file.Files.createFile;
import static java.nio.file.Files.createSymbolicLink;
import static java.nio.file.Files.createTempDirectory;
import static java.util.logging.Level.WARNING;

import com.google.common.base.Joiner;

    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this