import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Annotates a "top-level" type-variable usage that takes its nullness from the type argument
 * supplied by the user of the class. For example, {@code Multiset.Entry.getElement()} returns
 * {@code @ParametricNullness E}, which means:
 *
 * <ul>

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Annotates a "top-level" type-variable usage that takes its nullness from the type argument
 * supplied by the user of the class. For example, {@code Multiset.Entry.getElement()} returns
 * {@code @ParametricNullness E}, which means:
 *
 * <ul>

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
import java.lang.annotation.Target;

/**
 * Annotates a "top-level" type-variable usage that takes its nullness from the type argument
 * supplied by the user of the class. For example, {@code Multiset.Entry.getElement()} returns
 * {@code @ParametricNullness E}, which means:
 *
 * <ul>

  }

  public void testOneSecondBurst() {
    RateLimiter limiter = RateLimiter.create(5.0, stopwatch);
    stopwatch.sleepMillis(1000); // max capacity reached
    stopwatch.sleepMillis(1000); // this makes no difference
    limiter.acquire(1); // R0.00, since it's the first request

    limiter.acquire(1); // R0.00, from capacity
    limiter.acquire(3); // R0.00, from capacity

    ImmutableMap<Service, Long> startupTimes = serviceManager.startupTimes();
    assertThat(startupTimes).hasSize(2);
    assertThat(startupTimes.get(a)).isAtLeast(150);
    // Service b startup takes at least 353 millis, but starting the timer is delayed by at least
    // 150 milliseconds. so in a perfect world the timing would be 353-150=203ms, but since either

    Ordering<Integer> integers = Ordering.explicit(1);

    // Like by like equals like
    Ordering<Number> a = numbers.compound(numbers);

    // The compound takes the more specific type of the two, regardless of order

    Ordering<Number> b = numbers.compound(objects);
    Ordering<Number> c = objects.compound(numbers);

    Ordering<Integer> d = numbers.compound(integers);

    Ordering<Integer> integers = Ordering.explicit(1);

    // Like by like equals like
    Ordering<Number> a = numbers.compound(numbers);

    // The compound takes the more specific type of the two, regardless of order

    Ordering<Number> b = numbers.compound(objects);
    Ordering<Number> c = objects.compound(numbers);

    Ordering<Integer> d = numbers.compound(integers);

 * limitations under the License.
 */

package com.google.common.collect;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

/**
 * Dummy class that makes the GWT serialization policy happy. It isn't used on the server-side.
 *
 * @author Hayward Chan
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
class ForwardingImmutableCollection {

  /**
   * Various scenarios to be generated for each method under test. The actual scenario generation
   * (determining which scenarios are applicable to which methods and what the outcome should be)
   * takes place in {@link #addTests(TestSuite, Method)}.
   */
  private enum Scenario {
    SATISFIED_AND_UNOCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING,
    UNSATISFIED_AND_UNOCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING,
    SATISFIED_AND_OCCUPIED_BEFORE_ENTERING,

 * The GWT supersource for this class contains a field for each type.
 *
 * <p>For details about this hack, see {@code GwtSerializationDependencies}, which takes the same
 * approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
 *
 * <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)