* **Starlette** :
    * A les seconde meilleures performances après Uvicorn. Starlette utilise en réalité Uvicorn. De ce fait, il ne peut qu’être plus "lent" qu'Uvicorn car il requiert l'exécution de plus de code.
    * Cependant il nous apporte les outils pour construire une application web simple, avec un routage basé sur des chemins, etc.

FROM ubuntu:focal as ubuntu_source

# Modify contents of container
COPY --from=distroless_source /etc/ /home/etc
COPY --from=distroless_source /home/nonroot /home/nonroot
RUN echo istio-proxy:x:1337: >> /home/etc/group
RUN echo istio-proxy:x:1337:1337:istio-proxy:/nonexistent:/sbin/nologin >> /home/etc/passwd

# Customize distroless with the following:
# - password file
# - groups file
# - /home/nonroot directory

Canada/Yukon Chile/Continental Chile/EasterIsland Cuba EET EST EST5EDT Egypt Eire Etc/GMT Etc/GMT+0 Etc/GMT+1 Etc/GMT+10 Etc/GMT+11 Etc/GMT+12 Etc/GMT+2 Etc/GMT+3 Etc/GMT+4 Etc/GMT+5 Etc/GMT+6 Etc/GMT+7 Etc/GMT+8 Etc/GMT+9 Etc/GMT-0 Etc/GMT-1 Etc/GMT-10 Etc/GMT-11 Etc/GMT-12 Etc/GMT-13 Etc/GMT-14 Etc/GMT-2 Etc/GMT-3 Etc/GMT-4 Etc/GMT-5 Etc/GMT-6 Etc/GMT-7 Etc/GMT-8 Etc/GMT-9 Etc/GMT0 Etc/Greenwich Etc/UCT Etc/UTC Etc/Universal Etc/Zulu Europe/Amsterdam Europe/Andorra Europe/Astrakhan Europe/Athens Europe/Belfast...

              value: {{ template "minio.fullname" . }}
            - name: MINIO_PORT
              value: {{ .Values.service.port | quote }}
          volumeMounts:
            - name: etc-path
              mountPath: /etc/minio/mc
            - name: tmp
              mountPath: /tmp
            - name: minio-configuration
              mountPath: /config
            {{- if .Values.tls.enabled }}

    * If you are comparing Uvicorn, compare it against Daphne, Hypercorn, uWSGI, etc. Application servers.
* **Starlette**:
    * Will have the next best performance, after Uvicorn. In fact, Starlette uses Uvicorn to run. So, it probably can only get "slower" than Uvicorn by having to execute more code.
    * But it provides you the tools to build simple web applications, with routing based on paths, etc.

    * Si estás comparando Starlette, compáralo con Sanic, Flask, Django, etc. Frameworks web (o microframeworks).
* **FastAPI**:

No hará ninguna conversión de datos con modelos Pydantic, no convertirá el contenido a ningún tipo, etc.

Esto te da mucha flexibilidad. Puedes devolver cualquier tipo de dato, sobrescribir cualquier declaración de datos o validación, etc.

## Usando el `jsonable_encoder` en una `Response`

    elif [ -x /etc/init.d/fess ]; then
        if command -v invoke-rc.d >/dev/null; then
            invoke-rc.d fess stop || true
        else
            /etc/init.d/fess stop || true
        fi

    # older suse linux distributions do not ship with systemd
    # but do not have an /etc/init.d/ directory
    # this tries to start the fess service on these

* **Starlette**:
    * Terá a melhor performance, depois do Uvicorn. De fato, Starlette utiliza Uvicorn para rodar. Então, ele provavelmente será "mais lento" que Uvicorn por ter que executar mais código.
    * Mas ele fornece a você as ferramentas para construir aplicações _web_ simples, com roteamento baseado em caminhos, etc.

# -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

if [ -z "$MAVEN_SKIP_RC" ] ; then

  if [ -f /usr/local/etc/mavenrc ] ; then
    . /usr/local/etc/mavenrc
  fi

  if [ -f /etc/mavenrc ] ; then
    . /etc/mavenrc
  fi

  if [ -f "$HOME/.mavenrc" ] ; then
    . "$HOME/.mavenrc"
  fi

fi

# OS specific support. $var _must_ be set to either true or false.