* ordering of the keys.
   *
   * <p>Despite the method name, this method attempts to avoid actually copying the data when it is
   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *
   * <p>This method is not type-safe, as it may be called on a map with keys that are not mutually

      this.owner = owner;
      this.future = future;
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
      if (owner.value != this) {
        // nothing to do, we must have been cancelled, don't bother inspecting the future.
        return;
      }
      Object valueToSet = getFutureValue(future);
      if (ATOMIC_HELPER.casValue(owner, this, valueToSet)) {
        complete(

   * ordering of the keys.
   *
   * <p>Despite the method name, this method attempts to avoid actually copying the data when it is
   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *
   * <p>This method is not type-safe, as it may be called on a map with keys that are not mutually

       * TODO(cpovirk): Consider removing @CheckForNull here, as we've done with the other methods'
       * errorMessageTemplate parameters: It is unlikely that callers intend for their string
       * template to be null (though we do handle that case gracefully at runtime). I've left this
       * one as it is because one of our users has defined a wrapper API around Preconditions,

   * elements without resizing. Note that this is not what {@link HashSet#HashSet(int)} does, but it
   * is what most users want and expect it to do.
   *
   * <p>This behavior can't be broadly guaranteed, but has been tested with OpenJDK 1.7 and 1.8.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set

   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache
   * at a time, but since read operations and cache loading computations can proceed concurrently,

    assertEquals(Object.class, TypeToken.of(String[].class).getSupertype(Object.class).getType());
  }

  public void testGetSupertype_fromWildcard() {
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // can't do new TypeToken<? extends ...>() {}
    TypeToken<? extends List<String>> type =
        (TypeToken<? extends List<String>>)
            TypeToken.of(Types.subtypeOf(new TypeToken<List<String>>() {}.getType()));

    SortedMap<String, Double> transformed = transformValues(map, SQRT_FUNCTION);

    /*
     * We'd like to sanity check that we didn't get a NavigableMap out, but we
     * can't easily do so while maintaining GWT compatibility.
     */
    assertEquals(ImmutableSortedMap.of("a", 2.0, "b", 3.0), transformed);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // NavigableMap
  public void testNavigableMapTransformValues() {

    SortedMap<String, Double> transformed = transformValues(map, SQRT_FUNCTION);

    /*
     * We'd like to sanity check that we didn't get a NavigableMap out, but we
     * can't easily do so while maintaining GWT compatibility.
     */
    assertEquals(ImmutableSortedMap.of("a", 2.0, "b", 3.0), transformed);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // NavigableMap
  public void testNavigableMapTransformValues() {

  }

  /**
   * Creates a new {@code Multimap} backed by {@code map}, whose internal value collections are
   * generated by {@code factory}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning: do not use</b> this method when the collections returned by {@code factory}
   * implement either {@link List} or {@code Set}! Use the more specific method {@link