<!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->
          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>

    listeners.add(new PerListenerQueue<>(listener, executor));
  }

  /**
   * Enqueues an event to be run on currently known listeners.
   *
   * <p>The {@code toString} method of the Event itself will be used to describe the event in the
   * case of an error.
   *
   * @param event the callback to execute on {@link #dispatch}
   */
  public void enqueue(Event<L> event) {
    enqueueHelper(event, event);
  }

  /**

   * value that are {@linkplain Range#isConnected connected} to this range.
   *
   * <p>The behavior of {@link #get(Comparable) get(k)} after calling this method is identical to
   * the behavior described in {@link #put(Range, Object) put(range, value)}, however the ranges
   * returned from {@link #asMapOfRanges} will be different if there were existing entries which
   * connect to the given range and value.
   *

          <!-- We add the link ourselves, both so that we can choose Java 9 over the version that -source suggests and so that we can solve the JSR305 problem described below. -->
          <detectJavaApiLink>false</detectJavaApiLink>
          <offlineLinks>