}

  /**
   * Creates a {@code CompactLinkedHashSet} instance, with a high enough "initial capacity" that it
   * <i>should</i> hold {@code expectedSize} elements without rebuilding internal data structures.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set
   * @return a new, empty {@code CompactLinkedHashSet} with enough capacity to hold {@code
   *     expectedSize} elements without resizing

labels: ["type=addition"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our

labels: ["type=enhancement"]
body:
  - type: markdown
    attributes:
      value: >
        Filing feature requests is one of the most popular ways to contribute to Guava.


        Be aware, though: most feature requests are not accepted, even if they're suggested by
        a full-time Guava team member. [Feedback](https://stackoverflow.com/a/4543114) from our

  }

  /**
   * Creates a {@code CompactLinkedHashSet} instance, with a high enough "initial capacity" that it
   * <i>should</i> hold {@code expectedSize} elements without rebuilding internal data structures.
   *
   * @param expectedSize the number of elements you expect to add to the returned set
   * @return a new, empty {@code CompactLinkedHashSet} with enough capacity to hold {@code
   *     expectedSize} elements without resizing

```Python hl_lines="3  5-6"
{
    "name": "Baz",
    "description": None,
    "price": 50.2,
    "tax": 10.5,
    "tags": []
}
```

FastAPI is smart enough (actually, Pydantic is smart enough) to realize that, even though `description`, `tax`, and `tags` have the same values as the defaults, they were set explicitly (instead of taken from the defaults).

So, they will be included in the JSON response.

!!! tip

     * Exception.)
     */
    throw new UncheckedExecutionException(cause);
  }

  /*
   * Arguably we don't need a timed getUnchecked because any operation slow enough to require a
   * timeout is heavyweight enough to throw a checked exception and therefore be inappropriate to
   * use with getUnchecked. Further, it's not clear that converting the checked TimeoutException to

	// Offset and out size cannot be negative.
	if offset < 0 || length < 0 {
		return 0, errUnexpected
	}

	// Do we have enough blocks?
	if len(enBlocks) < dataBlocks {
		return 0, reedsolomon.ErrTooFewShards
	}

	// Do we have enough data?
	if int64(getDataBlockLen(enBlocks, dataBlocks)) < length {
		return 0, reedsolomon.ErrShortData
	}

	// Counter to decrement total left to write.

      added += q.drainTo(buffer, numElements - added);
      if (added < numElements) { // not enough elements immediately available; will have to poll
        E e = q.poll(deadline - System.nanoTime(), TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
        if (e == null) {
          break; // we already waited enough, and there are no more elements in sight
        }
        buffer.add(e);
        added++;
      }
    }

    assertThat(call.isCanceled()).isTrue()
    assertThat(exceptionRef.get()).isNotNull()
  }

  @Test
  fun timeoutReadingResponse() {
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse.Builder()
        .body(BIG_ENOUGH_BODY)
        .build(),
    )
    val request =
      Request.Builder()
        .url(server.url("/"))
        .build()
    val call = client.newCall(request)

  // +optional
  optional string selectedNode = 1;

  // PotentialNodes lists nodes where the Pod might be able to run.
  //
  // The size of this field is limited to 128. This is large enough for
  // many clusters. Larger clusters may need more attempts to find a node
  // that suits all pending resources. This may get increased in the
  // future, but not reduced.
  //
  // +listType=set
  // +optional