.testEquals();
  }

  private interface Loser<E extends Throwable> {
    void lose() throws E;
  }

  public <T extends Loser<AssertionError>> void testMethod_exceptionTypes()
      throws NoSuchMethodException {
    Method failMethod = Loser.class.getMethod("lose");
    Invokable<T, ?> invokable = new TypeToken<T>(getClass()) {}.method(failMethod);

        }
      }
    }
    for (Invokable<?, ?> factory : factories) {
      factory.setAccessible(true);
    }
    // Sorts methods/constructors with the least number of parameters first since it's likely easier
    // to fill dummy parameter values for them. Ties are broken by name then by the string form of
    // the parameter list.
    return BY_NUMBER_OF_PARAMETERS
        .compound(BY_METHOD_NAME)

   * invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet
   * started execution. It is unclear from the {@code ExecutorService} specification if these should
   * be included, and it's much easier to implement the interpretation that they not be. Finally, a
   * call to {@code shutdown} or {@code shutdownNow} may result in concurrent calls to {@code

     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily
     * cause a concurrent read operation to see inconsistent data. This is made easier by the
     * nature of the read operations in Map. For example, no operation can reveal that the table
     * has grown but the threshold has not yet been updated, so there are no atomicity requirements

 * Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>The {@link Predicates} class provides common predicates and related utilities.
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide article on <a

    Optional<String> optionalName = Optional.fromNullable("bob");
    assertEquals("bob", optionalName.get());
  }

  public void testFromNullable_null() {
    // not promised by spec, but easier to test
    assertSame(Optional.absent(), Optional.fromNullable(null));
  }

  public void testIsPresent_no() {
    assertFalse(Optional.absent().isPresent());
  }

 * Otherwise, at least reduce <i>explicit</i> dependencies on this type by using lambda expressions
 * or method references instead of classes, leaving your code easier to migrate in the future.
 *
 * <p>To use a reference of this type (say, named {@code guavaPredicate}) in a context where {@code
 * java.util.function.Predicate} is expected, use the method reference {@code

    Optional<String> optionalName = Optional.fromNullable("bob");
    assertEquals("bob", optionalName.get());
  }

  public void testFromNullable_null() {
    // not promised by spec, but easier to test
    assertSame(Optional.absent(), Optional.fromNullable(null));
  }

  public void testIsPresent_no() {
    assertFalse(Optional.absent().isPresent());
  }

     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily cause a
     * concurrent read operation to see inconsistent data. This is made easier by the nature of the
     * read operations in Map. For example, no operation can reveal that the table has grown but the
     * threshold has not yet been updated, so there are no atomicity requirements for this with

     * changing any bin. The operations must not take any action that could even momentarily cause a
     * concurrent read operation to see inconsistent data. This is made easier by the nature of the
     * read operations in Map. For example, no operation can reveal that the table has grown but the
     * threshold has not yet been updated, so there are no atomicity requirements for this with