// be extra careful: Scanner is for safe, simple jobs.
		for loop := 0; ; {
			n, err := s.r.Read(s.buf[s.end:len(s.buf)])
			if n < 0 || len(s.buf)-s.end < n {
				s.setErr(ErrBadReadCount)
				break
			}
			s.end += n
			if err != nil {
				s.setErr(err)
				break
			}
			if n > 0 {
				s.empties = 0
				break
			}
			loop++
			if loop > maxConsecutiveEmptyReads {
				s.setErr(io.ErrNoProgress)

		// Macro has arguments. Scan list of formals.
		acceptArg := true
		args = []string{} // Zero length but not nil.
	Loop:
		for {
			tok = in.Stack.Next()
			switch tok {
			case ')':
				tok = in.Stack.Next() // First token of macro definition.
				break Loop
			case ',':
				if acceptArg {
					in.Error("bad syntax in definition for macro:", name)
				}
				acceptArg = true

		}
	}
</pre>

<h3 id="Continue_statements">Continue statements</h3>

<p>
A "continue" statement begins the next iteration of the
innermost <a href="#For_statements">"for" loop</a> at its post statement.
The "for" loop must be within the same function.
</p>

<pre class="ebnf">
ContinueStmt = "continue" [ Label ] .
</pre>

<p>
If there is a label, it must be that of an enclosing

	{"·AddUint32(SB)", "pkg.AddUint32(SB)"},
	{"(R1, R3)", "(R1, R3)"},
	{"[R0,R1,g,R15", ""}, // Issue 11764 - asm hung parsing ']' missing register lists.
	{"[):[o-FP", ""},     // Issue 12469 - there was no infinite loop for ARM; these are just sanity checks.
	{"[):[R0-FP", ""},
	{"(", ""}, // Issue 12466 - backed up before beginning of line.
}

var ppc64OperandTests = []operandTest{
	{"$((1<<63)-1)", "$9223372036854775807"},

		p.errorf("expected identifier, found %q", p.lex.Text())
		return "", "", nil, false // Might as well stop now.
	}
	word, cond = p.lex.Text(), ""
	operands = scratch[:0]
	// Zero or more comma-separated operands, one per loop.
	nesting := 0
	colon := -1
	for tok != '\n' && tok != ';' {
		// Process one operand.
		var items []lex.Token
		if cap(operands) > len(operands) {
			// Reuse scratch items slice.

//	}
	ADDD	F1, F2, F3

//	LFCMP freg ',' freg
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &$2, 0, &$4);
//	}
	CMPEQD	F1, F2


//
// WORD
//
	WORD	$1	// 00000001
	NOOP		// 00000000
	SYNC		// 0000000f

//
// NOP
//
//	LNOP comma // asm doesn't support the trailing comma.
//	{
//		outcode(int($1), &nullgen, 0, &nullgen);
//	}
	NOP

print an empty string too.
Worse, there is no guarantee that the write to <code>done</code> will ever
be observed by <code>main</code>, since there are no synchronization
events between the two threads.  The loop in <code>main</code> is not
guaranteed to finish.
</p>

<p>
There are subtler variants on this theme, such as this program.
</p>

<pre>
type T struct {
	msg string
}

var g *T

	// files. Internally, the tar format often uses fake "files" to add meta
	// data that describes the next file. These meta data "files" should not
	// normally be visible to the outside. As such, this loop iterates through
	// one or more "header files" until it finds a "normal file".
	format := FormatUSTAR | FormatPAX | FormatGNU
	for {
		// Discard the remainder of the file and any padding.

</pre>

<h3 id="Continue_statements">Continue statements</h3>

<p>
A "continue" statement begins the next iteration of the
innermost enclosing <a href="#For_statements">"for" loop</a>
by advancing control to the end of the loop block.
The "for" loop must be within the same function.
</p>

<pre class="ebnf">
ContinueStmt = "continue" [ Label ] .
</pre>

<p>

	// See issue https://golang.org/issue/31891
	key := parent + " > " + dtype.String()

	if checkCache {
		if t, ok := c.m[key]; ok {
			if t.Go == nil {
				fatalf("%s: type conversion loop at %s", lineno(pos), dtype)
			}
			return t
		}
	}

	t := new(Type)
	t.Size = dtype.Size() // note: wrong for array of pointers, corrected below
	t.Align = -1