Optional<Integer> optionalInt = getSomeOptionalInt();
    // Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // error
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeError2() {
    FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();
    Optional<? extends Number> first = numbers.first();
    // Number value = first.or(0.5); // error
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test

    Optional<Integer> optionalInt = getSomeOptionalInt();
    // Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // error
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test
  public void testSampleCodeError2() {
    FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();
    Optional<? extends Number> first = numbers.first();
    // Number value = first.or(0.5); // error
  }

  @SuppressWarnings("unused") // compilation test

// The len built-in function returns the length of v, according to its type:
//
//	Array: the number of elements in v.
//	Pointer to array: the number of elements in *v (even if v is nil).
//	Slice, or map: the number of elements in v; if v is nil, len(v) is zero.
//	String: the number of bytes in v.
//	Channel: the number of elements queued (unread) in the channel buffer;
//	         if v is nil, len(v) is zero.
//

   * Optional<Number>} (where {@code Number} is the desired output type) solves the problem:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * Optional<Number> optionalInt = (Optional) getSomeOptionalInt();
   * Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // fine
   *
   * FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();
   * Optional<Number> first = (Optional) numbers.first();
   * Number value = first.or(0.5); // fine
   * }</pre>

    Ordering<Number> numbers = Ordering.explicit((Number) 1);
    Ordering<Integer> integers = Ordering.explicit(1);

    // Like by like equals like
    Ordering<Number> a = numbers.compound(numbers);

    // The compound takes the more specific type of the two, regardless of order

    Ordering<Number> b = numbers.compound(objects);
    Ordering<Number> c = objects.compound(numbers);

    Ordering<Number> numbers = Ordering.explicit((Number) 1);
    Ordering<Integer> integers = Ordering.explicit(1);

    // Like by like equals like
    Ordering<Number> a = numbers.compound(numbers);

    // The compound takes the more specific type of the two, regardless of order

    Ordering<Number> b = numbers.compound(objects);
    Ordering<Number> c = objects.compound(numbers);

   * Optional<Number>} (where {@code Number} is the desired output type) solves the problem:
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * Optional<Number> optionalInt = (Optional) getSomeOptionalInt();
   * Number value = optionalInt.or(0.5); // fine
   *
   * FluentIterable<? extends Number> numbers = getSomeNumbers();
   * Optional<Number> first = (Optional) numbers.first();
   * Number value = first.or(0.5); // fine
   * }</pre>

But as you go away from the counter and sit at the table with a number for your turn, you can switch 🔀 your attention to your crush, and "work" ⏯ 🤓 on that. Then you are again doing something very "productive" as is flirting with your crush 😍.

  repeated Job items = 2;
}

// JobSpec describes how the job execution will look like.
message JobSpec {
  // Specifies the maximum desired number of pods the job should
  // run at any given time. The actual number of pods running in steady state will
  // be less than this number when ((.spec.completions - .status.successful) < .spec.parallelism),
  // i.e. when the work left to do is less than max parallelism.

  // limit, which is a limit on the number of requests of this
  // priority level that may be exeucting at a given time.  ACS must
  // be a positive number. The server's concurrency limit (SCL) is
  // divided among the concurrency-controlled priority levels in
  // proportion to their assured concurrency shares. This produces
  // the assured concurrency value (ACV) --- the number of requests