};
    ;

    public abstract byte[] hash(Algorithm algorithm, byte[] input);
  }

  private enum Algorithm {
    MD5("MD5", Hashing.md5()),
    SHA_1("SHA-1", Hashing.sha1()),
    SHA_256("SHA-256", Hashing.sha256()),
    SHA_384("SHA-384", Hashing.sha384()),
    SHA_512("SHA-512", Hashing.sha512());

    private final String algorithmName;
    private final HashFunction hashFn;

 * the License.
 */

package com.google.common.hash;

import static com.google.common.hash.Hashing.ChecksumType.ADLER_32;
import static com.google.common.hash.Hashing.ChecksumType.CRC_32;

import java.util.zip.Checksum;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Tests for ChecksumHashFunction.
 *
 * @author Colin Decker
 */

              }
            });

    assertExpectedBytes(readBytes);
  }

  public void testHash() throws IOException {
    HashCode expectedHash = Hashing.md5().hashBytes(expected);
    assertEquals(expectedHash, source.hash(Hashing.md5()));
  }

  public void testSlice_illegalArguments() {
    assertThrows(
        "expected IllegalArgumentException for call to slice with offset -1: " + source,

 * little-endian order.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> The result of calling any methods after calling {@link #hash} is undefined.
 *
 * <p><b>Warning:</b> Using a specific character encoding when hashing a {@link CharSequence} with
 * {@link #putString(CharSequence, Charset)} is generally only useful for cross-language
 * compatibility (otherwise prefer {@link #putUnencodedChars}). However, the character encodings

   */
  private static void assertCrc(int expectedCrc, byte[] data) {
    int actualCrc = Hashing.crc32c().hashBytes(data).asInt();
    assertEquals(
        String.format("expected: %08x, actual: %08x", expectedCrc, actualCrc),
        expectedCrc,
        actualCrc);
    int actualCrcHasher = Hashing.crc32c().newHasher().putBytes(data).hash().asInt();
    assertEquals(

 *
 * <p>Parameters for the benchmark are:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>size: The length of the byte array to hash.
 *   <li>hashFunctionEnum: The {@link HashFunction} to use for hashing.
 * </ul>
 *
 * @author Kurt Alfred Kluever
 */
public class HashFunctionBenchmark {

  // Use a statically configured random instance for all of the benchmarks

   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I
   * see calls in Google code that pass a null `dir` to a FilenameFilter.... So let's declare the
   * parameter as non-nullable (since passing null to a FilenameFilter is unsafe in general), but if
   * someone still manages to pass null, let's continue to have the method work.
   *

/**
 * Unit test for FarmHashFingerprint64.
 *
 * @author Kyle Maddison
 * @author Geoff Pike
 */
public class FarmHashFingerprint64Test extends TestCase {

  private static final HashFunction HASH_FN = Hashing.farmHashFingerprint64();

  // If this test fails, all bets are off
  public void testReallySimpleFingerprints() {
    assertEquals(8581389452482819506L, fingerprint("test".getBytes(UTF_8)));
    // 32 characters long

          Function<? super T, ? extends K> keyFunction,
          Function<? super T, ? extends V> valueFunction) {
    return CollectCollectors.toImmutableBiMap(keyFunction, valueFunction);
  }

  // Casting to any type is safe because the set will never hold any elements.
  @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
  public static <K, V> ImmutableBiMap<K, V> of() {
    return (ImmutableBiMap<K, V>) RegularImmutableBiMap.EMPTY;
  }

        <artifactId>animal-sniffer-maven-plugin</artifactId>
      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <artifactId>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactId>
        <configuration>
          <!-- Passing `-subpackages com.google.common` breaks things, so we explicitly exclude everything else instead. -->
          <!-- excludePackageNames requires specification of packages separately from "all subpackages".