* <p>This version adds some verbosity around the {@code Guard} objects, but removes that same
 * verbosity, and more, from the {@code get} and {@code set} methods. {@code Monitor} implements the
 * same efficient signaling as we had to hand-code in the {@code ReentrantLock} version above.
 * Finally, the programmer no longer has to hand-code the wait loop, and therefore doesn't have to
 * remember to use {@code while} instead of {@code if}.
 *
 * <pre>{@code

       *
       * And, no, defining (final or not) local variables out of the loop still isn't as good
       * because the null check on the theUnsafe object remains inside the loop and
       * BYTE_ARRAY_BASE_OFFSET doesn't get constant-folded.
       *
       * The compiler can treat static final fields as compile-time constants and can constant-fold

 * named analogously to their {@code BigInteger} counterparts.
 *
 * <p>The implementations of many methods in this class are based on material from Henry S. Warren,
 * Jr.'s <i>Hacker's Delight</i>, (Addison Wesley, 2002).
 *
 * <p>Similar functionality for {@code int} and for {@link BigInteger} can be found in {@link

    // the behaviour of the non-GWT implementation of newConcurrentHashSet().
    // On the other hand HashSet might be better for code size if apps aren't
    // already using Collections.newSetFromMap and ConcurrentHashMap.
    return Collections.newSetFromMap(new ConcurrentHashMap<E, Boolean>());
  }

  static <E> Set<E> newLinkedHashSetWithExpectedSize(int expectedSize) {

 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.
 *

 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.
 *

  // 'inputFuture'. That field is non-final and non-volatile. There are 2 places where the
  // 'inputFuture' field is read and where we will have to consider visibility of the write
  // operation in the constructor.
  //
  // 1. In the listener that performs the callback. In this case it is fine since inputFuture is
  //    assigned prior to calling addListener, and addListener happens-before any invocation of the

    assertEvalsToFalse(Predicates.and(FALSE, NEVER_REACHED));
  }

  public void testAnd_equalityBinary() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(Predicates.and(TRUE, NEVER_REACHED), Predicates.and(TRUE, NEVER_REACHED))
        .addEqualityGroup(Predicates.and(NEVER_REACHED, TRUE))
        .addEqualityGroup(Predicates.and(TRUE))
        .addEqualityGroup(Predicates.or(TRUE, NEVER_REACHED))

   * This counter prevents an ABA issue where a thread may successfully schedule the worker, the
   * worker runs and exhausts the queue, another thread enqueues a task and fails to schedule the
   * worker, and then the first thread's call to delegate.execute() returns. Without this counter,
   * it would observe the QUEUING state and set it to QUEUED, and the worker would never be
   * scheduled again for future submissions.
   */
  @GuardedBy("queue")

 * remove) are supported. Null keys and values are supported.
 *
 * <p>{@code containsKey(k)}, {@code put(k, v)} and {@code remove(k)} are all (expected and
 * amortized) constant time operations. Expected in the hashtable sense (depends on the hash
 * function doing a good job of distributing the elements to the buckets to a distribution not far