Jinzhu <******@****.***> 1756991596 +0800

		},
		{
			Name:     "generics-nested-joins-2",
			Manager:  GetUser("generics-nested-joins-manager-2", Config{Company: true, NamedPet: true}),
			NamedPet: &Pet{Name: "generics-nested-joins-namepet-2", Toy: Toy{Name: "generics-nested-joins-namepet-toy-2"}},
		},
	}

	ctx := context.Background()
	db := gorm.G[User](DB)

     * non-reified type or has bounds, {@code forDependants} is used to do further resolution, which
     * doesn't try to resolve any type variable on generic declarations that are already being
     * resolved.
     *
     * <p>Should only be called and overridden by {@link #resolve(TypeVariable)}.
     */

	allConfigs := r.Form.Get("allConfigs") == "true"
	if cfgName == "" && !allConfigs {
		cfgName = madmin.Default
	}

	if isAll && len(userList) > 0 {
		// This should be checked on client side, so return generic error
		writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrInvalidRequest), r.URL)
		return
	}

	// Empty DN list and not self, list access keys for all users
	if isAll {
		if !globalIAMSys.IsAllowed(policy.Args{

     * non-reified type or has bounds, {@code forDependants} is used to do further resolution, which
     * doesn't try to resolve any type variable on generic declarations that are already being
     * resolved.
     *
     * <p>Should only be called and overridden by {@link #resolve(TypeVariable)}.
     */

## 0.31.0

* Upgrade Pydantic supported version to `0.29.0`.
    * New supported version range is `"pydantic >=0.28,<=0.29.0"`.
    * This adds support for Pydantic [Generic Models](https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/#generic-models), kudos to [@dmontagu](https://github.com/dmontagu).
    * PR [#344](https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/pull/344).

## 0.30.1

    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();
  }

  /*

    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();
  }

  /*

        return new TypeToken<SubBar<T>>() {};
      }
    }

    Field delegateField = SubBar.class.getDeclaredField("delegate");
    // barType is Bar<T>, a ParameterizedType with no generic arguments specified
    TypeToken<?> barType = TypeToken.of(delegateField.getGenericType());
    assertThat(barType.getSubtype(SubBar.class)).isEqualTo(new SubBar<Void>().fieldTypeAsSubBar());
  }

        return new TypeToken<SubBar<T>>() {};
      }
    }

    Field delegateField = SubBar.class.getDeclaredField("delegate");
    // barType is Bar<T>, a ParameterizedType with no generic arguments specified
    TypeToken<?> barType = TypeToken.of(delegateField.getGenericType());
    assertThat(barType.getSubtype(SubBar.class)).isEqualTo(new SubBar<Void>().fieldTypeAsSubBar());
  }