}

	// check for proceeding surrogate pair
	c = d.next()
	if !utf16.IsSurrogate(r) || c != '\\' {
		d.scratch.addRune(r)
		goto scan
	}
	if c = d.next(); c != 'u' {
		d.scratch.addRune(r)
		goto scan_esc
	}

	r2 := d.u4()
	if r2 < 0 {
		return "", d.mkError(ErrSyntax, "in unicode escape sequence")
	}

	// write surrogate pair
	d.scratch.addRune(utf16.DecodeRune(r, r2))

        }
      } else {
        // and everything else is replaced with FFFD.
        assertEscaping(xmlEscaper, "\uFFFD", ch);
      }
    }

    // Test _all_ allowed characters (including surrogate values).
    for (char ch = 0x20; ch <= 0xFFFD; ch++) {
      // There are a small number of cases to consider, so just do it manually.
      if (ch == '&') {
        assertEscaping(xmlEscaper, "&amp;", ch);

                        new SimpleOptionalitySelector(), new ManagedScopeDeriver(getScopeManager())),
                new ManagedDependencyContextRefiner(getScopeManager()));
    }

    /**
     * This method produces "surrogate" type registry that is static: it aims users that want to use
     * Maven-Resolver without involving Maven Core and related things.
     * <p>

	var (
		counter int
		mv      *MetaValue
		body    = `{
  "1": {
    "bio": "bada bing bada boom",
    "id": 0,
    "name": "Roberto",
    "nested1": {
      "bio": "utf16 surrogate (\ud834\udcb2)\n\u201cutf 8\u201d",
      "id": 1.5,
      "name": "Roberto*Maestro",
      "nested2": { "nested2arr": [0,1,2], "nested3": {
        "nested4": { "depth": "recursion" }}
			}
		}
  },
  "2": {

    }
  }

  /**
   * This verifies that putUnencodedChars(String) and hashUnencodedChars(String) are equivalent,
   * even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {

    }
  }

  /**
   * This verifies that putUnencodedChars(String) and hashUnencodedChars(String) are equivalent,
   * even for funny strings composed by (possibly unmatched, and mostly illegal) surrogate
   * characters. (But doesn't test that they do the right thing - just their consistency).
   */
  private static void assertHashStringWithSurrogatesEquivalence(
      HashFunction hashFunction, Random random) {