var
mig
sig
men
et
har
om
vi
min
havde
ham
hun
nu
over
da
fra
du
ud
sin
dem
os
op
man
hans
hvor
eller
hvad
skal
selv
her
alle
vil
blev
kunne
ind
når
være
dog
noget
ville
jo
deres
efter
ned
skulle
denne
end
dette
mit
også
under
have
dig
anden
hende
mine
alt
meget
sit

"af", "for", "ikke", "der", "var", "mig", "sig", "men", "et", "har", "om", "vi", "min", "havde", "ham", "hun", "nu", "over", "da", "fra", "du", "ud", "sin", "dem", "os", "op", "man", "hans", "hvor", "eller", "hvad", "skal", "selv", "her", "alle", "vil", "blev", "kunne", "ind", "når", "være", "dog", "noget", "ville", "jo", "deres", "efter", "ned", "skulle", "denne", "end", "dette", "mit", "også", "under", "have", "dig", "anden", "hende", "mine", "alt", "meget", "sit", "sine", "vor", "mod", "disse",...

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Locale;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Since annotations have some reusability issues that force copy and paste all over the place, it's
 * worth having a test to ensure that all our Feature enums have their annotations correctly set up.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
public class FeatureEnumTest extends TestCase {

            caughtSpecific = true;
        } catch (RuntimeException e) {
            caughtRuntime = true;
        }

        assertTrue("Should have caught DictionaryExpiredException", caughtSpecific);
        assertFalse("Should not have caught as RuntimeException", caughtRuntime);
    }

    public void test_rethrow() {
        // Test rethrowing the exception

        valve1.setShowReport(true);
        valve1.setShowServerInfo(true);

        // valve2 should still have default values
        assertFalse("valve2 should have independent ShowReport setting", valve2.isShowReport());
        assertFalse("valve2 should have independent ShowServerInfo setting", valve2.isShowServerInfo());
    }

    public void test_toggleSettingsMultipleTimes() {

        return true
      }
    }

    // If we have a routes left, use 'em.
    if (routeSelection?.hasNext() == true) return true

    // If we haven't initialized the route selector yet, assume it'll have at least one route.
    val localRouteSelector = routeSelector ?: return true

    // If we do have a route selector, use its routes.
    return localRouteSelector.hasNext()
  }

  /**

          required: true
        - label: >
            I have read and understood the [contribution
            guidelines](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/HowToContribute#feature-requests).
          required: true
        - label: >
            I have read and understood
            [Guava's philosophy](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained), and

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>

    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

    (I hope that this workaround does not cause its own problems in the future.)
-->
<super-source path="super"/>