assertCrc(0, new byte[0]);
  }

  public void testZeros() {
    // Test 32 byte array of 0x00.
    byte[] zeros = new byte[32];
    assertCrc(0x8a9136aa, zeros);
  }

  public void testZeros100() {
    // Test 100 byte array of 0x00.
    byte[] zeros = new byte[100];
    assertCrc(0x07cb9ff6, zeros);
  }

  public void testFull() {
    // Test 32 byte array of 0xFF.
    byte[] fulls = new byte[32];

  static {
    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
    String zeros =
        "0\u0660\u06f0\u07c0\u0966\u09e6\u0a66\u0ae6\u0b66\u0be6\u0c66"
            + "\u0ce6\u0d66\u0e50\u0ed0\u0f20\u1040\u1090\u17e0\u1810\u1946"
            + "\u19d0\u1b50\u1bb0\u1c40\u1c50\ua620\ua8d0\ua900\uaa50\uff10";
    for (char base : zeros.toCharArray()) {
      for (int offset = 0; offset < 10; offset++) {

  static int log10Floor(long x) {
    /*
     * Based on Hacker's Delight Fig. 11-5, the two-table-lookup, branch-free implementation.
     *
     * The key idea is that based on the number of leading zeros (equivalently, floor(log2(x))), we
     * can narrow the possible floor(log10(x)) values to two. For example, if floor(log2(x)) is 6,
     * then 64 <= x < 128, so floor(log10(x)) is either 1 or 2.
     */

- The apiserver will now return warnings if you create objects with "invalid" IP or
  CIDR values (like "192.168.000.005", which should not have the extra zeros).
  Values with non-standard formats can introduce security problems, and will

    } finally {
      pool.shutdownNow();
    }

    // Since we have access to the backing map, verify that there are no zeroes in the map
    for (AtomicInteger value : map.values()) {
      assertTrue("map should not contain a zero", value.get() != 0);
    }
  }

  private static class MutateTask implements Callable<int[]> {
    private final ConcurrentHashMultiset<String> multiset;

  @ListFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX)
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  public void testAddAtIndex_supportedPresent() {
    getList().add(0, e0());
    expectAdded(0, e0());
  }

  @ListFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD_WITH_INDEX)
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  /*
   * absent = ZERO isn't required, since unmodList.add() must
   * throw regardless, but it keeps the method name accurate.

import static com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionSize.SEVERAL;
import static com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionSize.ZERO;
import static com.google.common.collect.testing.google.ReflectionFreeAssertThrows.assertThrows;
import static java.util.Arrays.asList;

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary

   * it is returned directly. Otherwise, a new array of size {@code minLength + padding} is
   * returned, containing the values of {@code array}, and zeroes in the remaining places.
   *
   * @param array the source array
   * @param minLength the minimum length the returned array must guarantee
   * @param padding an extra amount to "grow" the array by if growth is necessary