### Burger Conclusion

In this scenario of "fast food burgers with your crush", as there is a lot of waiting 🕙, it makes a lot more sense to have a concurrent system ⏸🔀⏯.

This is the case for most of the web applications.

Many, many users, but your server is waiting 🕙 for their not-so-good connection to send their requests.

And then waiting 🕙 again for the responses to come back.

And it shows their true commitment to FastAPI and its **community** (you), as they not only want to provide you a **good learning experience** but also want to make sure you have a **good and healthy framework**, FastAPI. 🙇

You might want to try their courses:

* <a href="https://training.talkpython.fm/fastapi-courses" class="external-link" target="_blank">Talk Python Training</a>

    rare occasion we may reject it.

**3. Review**

-   For a valid PR, reviewer (person familiar with the code/functionality)
    checks if the PR looks good or needs additional changes.
-   If all looks good, the reviewer will approve the PR.
-   If a change is needed, the contributor is requested to make the suggested
    change.
-   You make the change and submit it for the review again.

  return if (address is InetSocketAddress) address.hostName else address.toString()
}

/**
 * Returns true if new reads and writes should be attempted on this.
 *
 * Unfortunately Java's networking APIs don't offer a good health check, so we go on our own by
 * attempting to read with a short timeout. If the fails immediately we know the socket is
 * unhealthy.
 *
 * @param source the source used to read bytes from the socket.
 */

      // Postponed routes are always tried last. For example, if we have 2 proxies and all the
      // routes for proxy1 should be postponed, we'll move to proxy2. Only after we've exhausted
      // all the good routes will we attempt the postponed routes.
      val proxy = nextProxy()
      for (inetSocketAddress in inetSocketAddresses) {
        val route = Route(address, proxy, inetSocketAddress)

And it shows their true commitment to FastAPI and its **community** (you), as they not only want to provide you a **good service** but also want to make sure you have a **good and healthy framework**, FastAPI. 🙇

You might want to try their services and follow their guides:

        .build(),
    )
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse(body = "abc"),
    )
    // Enqueue an additional response that show if we burnt a good prior response.
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse(body = "XXX"),
    )
    val call1 = client.newCall(Request(server.url("/")))
    val response1 = call1.execute()

### Understand the problem

* First, make sure you **understand the problem** that the pull request is trying to solve. It might have a longer discussion in a GitHub Discussion or issue.

* There's also a good chance that the pull request is not actually needed because the problem can be solved in a **different way**. Then you can suggest or ask about that.

### Don't worry about style

### Parallel Hamburgerler

Şimdi bunların "Eşzamanlı Hamburger" değil, "Paralel Hamburger" olduğunu düşünelim.

Hamburger 🍔 almak için 😍 aşkınla Paralel fast food'a gidiyorsun.

Birden fazla kasiyer varken (varsayalım 8) sıraya girdiniz👩‍🍳👨‍🍳👩‍🍳👨‍🍳👩‍🍳👨‍🍳👩‍🍳👨‍🍳 ve sıranız gelene kadar bekliyorsunuz.

     * both say in their comments that they're not really sure what the right approach is. We go
     * with Chrome's behavior (which also experimentally seems to match what IE does), but if you
     * actually want to have a good chance of things working, please avoid double-quotes, newlines,
     * percent signs, and the like in your field names.
     */
    internal fun StringBuilder.appendQuotedString(key: String) {
      append('"')